Source author record

Tomasz I. Tylec

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
3topics
3close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Ignorance is a bliss: mathematical structure of many-box models

We show that the propositional system of a many-box model is always a set-representable effect algebra. In particular cases of 2-box and 1-box models it is an orthomodular poset and an orthomodular lattice respectively. We discuss the relation of the obtained results with the so-called Local Orthogonality principle. We argue that non-classical properties of box models are the result of a dual enrichment of the set of states caused by the impoverishment of the set of propositions. On the other hand, quantum mechanical models always have more propositions as well as more states than the classical ones. Consequently, we show that the box models cannot be considered as generalizations of quantum mechanical models and seeking for additional principles that could allow to "recover quantum correlations" in box models is, at least from the fundamental point of view, pointless.

preprint2015arXiv

Non-signalling theories and generalized probability

We provide mathematicaly rigorous justification of using term "probability" in connection to the so called non-signalling theories,known also as Popescu's and Rohrlich's box worlds. No only do we prove correctness of these models (in the sense that they describe composite system of two independent subsystems) but we obtain new properties of non-signalling boxes and expose new tools for further investigation. Moreover, it allows strightforward generalization to more complicated systems.

preprint2012arXiv

On the structure of positive maps II: low dimensional matrix algebras

We use a new idea that emerged in the examination of exposed positive maps between matrix algebras to investigate in more detail the difference between positive maps on M2(C)M_2(C) and M3(C)M_3(C). Our main tool stems from classical Grothendieck theorem on tensor product of Banach spaces and is an older and more general version of Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism between positive maps and block positive Choi matrices. It takes into account the correct topology on the latter set that is induced by the uniform topology on positive maps. In this setting we show that in M2(C)M_2(C) case a large class of nice positive maps can be generated from the small set of maps represented by self-adjoint unitaries, 2Px2 P_x with xx maximally entangled vector and p⊗1p\otimes 1 with pp rank 1 projector. We show why this construction fails in M3(C)M_3(C) case. There are also similarities. In both M2(C)M_2(C) and M3(C)M_3(C) cases any unital positive map represented by self-adjoint unitary is unitarily equivalent to the transposition map. Consequently we obtain a large family of exposed maps. We also investigate a convex structure of the Choi map, the first example of non-decomposable map. As a result the nature of the Choi map will be explained. This gives an information on the origin of appearance of non-decomposable maps on M3(C)M_3(C).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.