BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Toby Sanders

Toby Sanders appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.NANumerical Analysiseess.IV

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Fixed Point Iterations for SURE-based PSF Estimation for Image Deconvolution

Stein's unbiased risk estimator (SURE) has been shown to be an effective metric for determining optimal parameters for many applications. The topic of this article is focused on the use of SURE for determining parameters for blind deconvolution. The parameters include those that define the shape of the point spread function (PSF), as well as regularization parameters in the deconvolution formulas. Within this context, the optimal parameters are typically determined via a brute for search over the feasible parameter space. When multiple parameters are involved, this parameter search is prohibitively costly due to the curse of dimensionality. In this work, novel fixed point iterations are proposed for optimizing these parameters, which allows for rapid estimation of a relatively large number of parameters. We demonstrate that with some mild tuning of the optimization parameters, these fixed point methods typically converge to the ideal PSF parameters in relatively few iterations, e.g. 50-100, with each iteration requiring very low computational cost.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

New Computational Techniques for a Faster Variation of BM3D Image Denoising

BM3D has been considered the standard for comparison in the image denoising literature for the last decade. Though it has been shown to be surpassed numerous times by alternative algorithms in terms of PSNR, the margins are very thin, and denoising is approaching a limiting point. The reason for the continued use of BM3D within the literature is due to its off-the-shelf ease-of-use in any application, which alternative improved denoising algorithms sometimes fail to match. This article proposes a new variation of BM3D, which maintains its ease of use but is notably faster. This development brings us closer to real-time ease-of-use application of new state-of-the-art image reconstruction algorithms such as plug-and-play priors. We refer to our variation of BM3D as G-BM3D. In terms of image quality, our algorithm attains very similar denoising performance to the original algorithm. Though our algorithm is written completely in MATLAB software, it is already between 5-20 times faster than the original algorithm, and the modifications to the algorithm are such that it is expected to be significantly faster when ported to CUDA language and with more powerful GPUs. The improved processing time is achieved by two main components. The first component is a new computational strategy that achieves faster block matching, and the second is a new global approach to the 3D wavelet filtering step that allows for significantly improved processing times on GPUs. The fast block matching strategy could also be applied to any of the vast number of nonlocal self-similarity (NSS) denoisers to improve processing times.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Effective New Methods for Automated Parameter Selection in Regularized Inverse Problems

The choice of the parameter value for regularized inverse problems is critical to the results and remains a topic of interest. This article explores a criterion for selecting a good parameter value by maximizing the probability of the data, {with no prior knowledge of the noise variance}. These concepts are developed for $\ell_2$ and consequently $\ell_1$ regularization models by way of their Bayesian interpretations. Based on these concepts, an iterative scheme is proposed and demonstrated to converge accurately, and analytical convergence results are provided that substantiate these empirical observations. For some of the most common inverse problems, including MRI, SAR, denoising, and deconvolution, an extremely efficient algorithm is derived, making the iterative scheme very attractive for real case use. The computational concerns associated with the general case for any inverse problem are also carefully addressed. A robust set of 1D and 2D numerical simulations confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access