BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for researchDiscover
Workspaces
Network
Opportunities
Account
Researcher profile
Tobias Blanke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.
Trust snapshot
Actions
Research graph
Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Published work
This book chapter attempts to counter anxieties in the humanities and social science about the role of big data in research by focusing on approaches which, by being firmly grounded in the traditional values of disciplines, enhance existing methods to produce fruitful research. Big data poses many methodological challenges, but these pressures should prompt scholars to pay much closer attention to methodological issues than they have in the past.
Humanities have convincingly argued that they need transnational research opportunities and through the digital transformation of their disciplines also have the means to proceed with it on an up to now unknown scale. The digital transformation of research and its resources means that many of the artifacts, documents, materials, etc. that interest humanities research can now be combined in new and innovative ways. Due to the digital transformations, (big) data and information have become central to the study of culture and society. Humanities research infrastructures manage, organise and distribute this kind of information and many more data objects as they becomes relevant for social and cultural research.
The European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (EHRI) has been set up by the European Union to create a sustainable complex of services for researchers. EHRI will bring together information about dispersed collections, based on currently more than 20 partner organisations in 13 countries and many other archives. EHRI, which brings together historians, archivists and specialists in digital humanities, strives to develop innovative on-line tools for finding, researching and sharing knowledge about the Holocaust. While connecting information about Holocaust collections, it strives to create tools and approaches applicable to other digital archival projects. The paper describes its current progress and collaboration across the disciplines involved.
The paper presents some of our work on integrating datasets in Classics. We present the results of various projects we had in this domain. The conclusions from LaQuAT concerned limitations to the approach rather than solutions. The relational model followed by OGSA-DAI was more effective for resources that consist primarily of structured data (which we call data-centric) rather than for largely unstructured text (which we call text-centric), which makes up a significant component of the datasets we were using. This approach was, moreover, insufficiently flexible to deal with the semantic issues. The gMan project, on the other hand, addressed these problems by virtualizing data resources using full-text indexes, which can then be used to provide different views onto the collections and services that more closely match the sort of information organization and retrieval activities found in the humanities, in an environment that is more interactive, researcher-focused, and researcher-driven.