BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tobias Binninger

Tobias Binninger contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Advancement of the Homogeneous Background Method for the Computational Simulation of Electrochemical Interfaces

Computational studies of electrochemical interfaces based on density-functional theory (DFT) play an increasingly important role in present research on electrochemical processes for energy conversion and storage. The homogeneous background method (HBM) offers a straightforward approach to charge the electrochemical system within DFT simulations, but it typically requires the specification of the "active" fraction of excess electrons based on a certain choice of the electrode-electrolyte boundary location, which can be difficult in presence of electrode-surface adsorbates or explicit solvent molecules. In this work, we present a methodological advancement of the HBM, both facilitating and extending its applicability. The advanced version neither requires energy corrections nor the specification of the "active" fraction of excess electrons, providing a versatile and readily available method for the simulation of charged interfaces also when adsorbates or explicit solvent molecules are present. Our computational DFT results for Pt(111), Au(111) and Li(100) metal electrodes in high-dielectric-constant solvents demonstrate an excellent agreement in the interfacial charging characteristics obtained from simulations with the advanced HBM in comparison with the (linearized) Poisson-Boltzmann model (PBM).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Piecewise Non-Linearity and Capacitance in the Joint Density Functional Theory of Extended Interfaces

The ab initio simulation of charged interfaces in the framework of density functional theory (DFT) is heavily employed for the study of electrochemical energy conversion processes. The capacitance is the primary descriptor for the response of the electrochemical interface. It is essentially equal to the inverse of the energy curvature as a function of electron number, and as such there appears a conflict with the fundamental principle of piecewise linearity in DFT that requires the energy curvature to be zero at fractional electron numbers, i.e. almost everywhere. To resolve this conflict, we derive an exact expression between the energy curvature and the Kohn-Sham density of states, the local density of states, and the Fukui potential. We find that the piecewise linearity requirement does not hold for the volume- or area-specific energy of extended systems and surfaces. Applied to the joint density functional theory of an electrode-electrolyte interface, including the ionic and dielectric response of the electrolyte, the same expression represents a rigorous basis for the partitioning of the total interfacial capacitance into contributions of the quantum capacitance, space-charge capacitance, and electrochemical double-layer capacitance. It provides insight into the influence of the electrode material, thickness, and temperature on the charging characteristics, as demonstrated by results for a bulk gold electrode, a single-layer gold electrode, and a single-layer graphene electrode.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Comparison of computational methods for the electrochemical stability window of solid-state electrolyte materials

Superior stability and safety are key promises attributed to all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) containing solid-state electrolyte (SSE) compared to their conventional counterparts utilizing liquid electrolyte. To unleash the full potential of ASSBs, SSE materials that are stable when in contact with the low and high potential electrodes are required. The electrochemical stability window is conveniently used to assess the SSE-electrode interface stability. In the present work, we review the most important methods to compute the SSE stability window. Our analysis reveals that the stoichiometry stability method represents a bridge between HOMO-LUMO method and phase stability method (grand canonical phase diagram). Moreover, we provide computational implementations of these methods for SSE material screening. We compare their results for the relevant Li- and Na-SSE materials LGPS, LIPON, LLZO, LLTO, LATP, LISICON, and NASICON, and we discuss their relation to published experimental stability windows.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access