Researcher profile

Tina N. Mihm

Tina N. Mihm contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Machine learning for a finite size correction in periodic coupled cluster theory calculations

We introduce a straightforward Gaussian process regression (GPR) model for the transition structure factor of metal periodic coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) calculations. This is inspired by the method introduced by Liao and Grüneis for interpolating over the transition structure factor to obtain a finite size correction for CCSD [J. Chem. Phys. 145, 141102 (2016)], and by our own prior work using the transition structure factor to efficiently converge CCSD for metals to the thermodynamic limit [Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 801 (2021)]. In our CCSD-FS-GPR method to correct for finite size errors, we fit the structure factor to a 1D function in the momentum transfer, $G$. We then integrate over this function by projecting it onto a k-point mesh to obtain comparisons with extrapolated results. Results are shown for lithium, sodium, and the uniform electron gas.

preprint2021arXiv

Effective Hamiltonians for the study of real metals using quantum chemical theories

Computationally efficient and accurate quantum mechanical approximations to solve the many-electron Schrödinger equation are at the heart of computational materials science. In that respect the coupled cluster hierarchy of methods plays a central role in molecular quantum chemistry because of its systematic improvability and computational efficiency. In this hierarchy, coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) is one of the most important steps in moving towards chemical accuracy and, in recent years, its scope has successfully been expanded to the study of insulating surfaces and solids. Here, we show that CCSD theory can also be applied to real metals. In so doing, we overcome the limitation of needing extremely large supercells to capture long range electronic correlation effects. An effective Hamiltonian can be found using the transition structure factor--a map of electronic excitations from the Hartree--Fock wavefunction--which has fewer finite size effects than conventional periodic boundary conditions. This not only paves the way of applying coupled cluster methods to real metals but also reduces the computational cost by two orders of magnitude compared to previous methods. Our applications to phases of lithium and silicon show a resounding success in reaching the thermodynamic limit, taking the first step towards a truly universal quantum chemical treatment of solids.

preprint2020arXiv

Accelerating convergence to the thermodynamic limit with twist angle selection applied to methods beyond many-body perturbation theory

We recently developed a scheme to use low-cost calculations to find a single twist angle where the couple cluster doubles energy of a single calculation matches the twist-averaged coupled cluster doubles energy in a finite unit cell. We used initiator full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo ($i$-FCIQMC) as an example of an exact method beyond coupled cluster doubles theory to show that this selected twist angle approach had comparable accuracy in methods beyond coupled cluster. Further, at least for small system sizes, we show that the same twist angle can also be found by comparing the energy directly (at the level of second-order Moller-Plesset theory) suggesting a route toward twist angle selection which requires minimal modification to existing codes which can perform twist averaging.