Researcher profile

Thomas W. Mattman

Thomas W. Mattman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
10works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Intrinsically knotted graphs with 21 edges

We show that the 14 graphs obtained by $\nabla\mathrm{Y}$ moves on K_7 constitute a complete list of the minor minimal intrinsically knotted graphs on 21 edges. We also present evidence in support of a conjecture that the 20 graph Heawood family, obtained by a combination of $\nabla\mathrm{Y}$ and $\mathrm{Y}\nabla$ moves on K_7, is the list of graphs of size 21 that are minor minimal with respect to the property not 2--apex.

preprint2011arXiv

Tangle sums and factorization of A-polynomials

We show that there exist infinitely many examples of pairs of knots, K_1 and K_2, that have no epimorphism $π_1(S^3\setminus K_1) \to π_1(S^3\setminus K_2)$ preserving peripheral structure although their A-polynomials have the factorization $A_{K_2}(L,M) \mid A_{K_1}(L,M)$. Our construction accounts for most of the known factorizations of this form for knots with 10 or fewer crossings. In particular, we conclude that while an epimorphism will lead to a factorization of A-polynomials, the converse generally fails.

preprint2011arXiv

The $A$-polynomial of the $(-2,3,3+2n)$ pretzel knots

We show that the A-polynomial $A_n$ of the 1-parameter family of pretzel knots $K_n=(-2,3,3+2n)$ satisfies a linear recursion relation of order 4 with explicit constant coefficients and initial conditions. Our proof combines results of Tamura-Yokota and the second author. As a corollary, we show that the $A$-polynomial of $K_n$ and the mirror of $K_{-n}$ are related by an explicit $\GL(2,\BZ)$ action. We leave open the question of whether or not this action lifts to the quantum level.

preprint2009arXiv

Graphs of 20 edges are 2-apex, hence unknotted

A graph is 2-apex if it is planar after the deletion of at most two vertices. Such graphs are not intrinsically knotted, IK. We investigate the converse, does not IK imply 2-apex? We determine the simplest possible counterexample, a graph on nine vertices and 21 edges that is neither IK nor 2-apex. In the process, we show that every graph of 20 or fewer edges is 2-apex. This provides a new proof that an IK graph must have at least 21 edges. We also classify IK graphs on nine vertices and 21 edges and find no new examples of minor minimal IK graphs in this set.

preprint2008arXiv

Commensurability classes of (-2,3,n) pretzel knot complements

Let K be a hyperbolic (-2,3,n) pretzel knot and M = S^3 K its complement. For these knots, we verify a conjecture of Reid and Walsh: there are at most three knot complements in the commensurability class of M. Indeed, if n \neq 7, we show that M is the unique knot complement in its class. We include examples to illustrate how our methods apply to a broad class of Montesinos knots.