Source author record

Thomas Seiller

Thomas Seiller appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

20works
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

20 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Novel Loop Fission Technique Inspired by Implicit Computational Complexity

This work explores an unexpected application of Implicit Computational Complexity (ICC) to parallelize loops in imperative programs. Thanks to a lightweight dependency analysis, our algorithm allows splitting a loop into multiple loops that can be run in parallel, resulting in gains in terms of execution time similar to state-of-the-art automatic parallelization tools when both are applicable. Our graph-based algorithm is intuitive, language-agnostic, proven correct, and applicable to all types of loops, even if their loop iteration space is unknown statically or at compile time, if they are not in canonical form or if they contain loop-carried dependency. As contributions we deliver the computational technique, proof of its preservation of semantic correctness, and experimental results to quantify the expected performance gains. Our benchmarks also show that the technique could be seamlessly integrated into compiler passes or other automatic parallelization suites. We assert that this original and automatable loop transformation method was discovered thanks to the "orthogonal" approach offered by ICC.

preprint2022arXiv

Agafonov's Proof of Agafonov's Theorem: A Modern Account and New Insights

We give a modern account of Agafonov's original proof of his eponymous theorem. The original proof was only reported in Russian in a journal not widely available, and the work most commonly cited in western literature is instead the English translation of a summary version containing no proofs, and the main proof relied heavily on material well-known in Russian mathematical circles of the day, which perhaps obscures the main thrust of argumentation for modern readers.Our present account recasts Aganofov's arguments using more basic building blocks than in the original proof, and contains some further embellishments to Agafonov's original arguments, made in the interest of clarity. We posit that the modern account provides new insight to the underlying phenomena of the theorem.We also provides some historical context to Agafonov's work, including a short description of some of the ideas that led to Agafonov's own proof, especially emphasizing the important work of Postnikova.

preprint2022arXiv

Multiplicative linear logic from a resolution-based tile system

We present the stellar resolution, a "flexible" tile system based on Robinson's first-order resolution. After establishing formal definitions and basic properties of the stellar resolution, we show its Turing-completeness and to illustrate the model, we exhibit how it naturally represents computation with Horn clauses and automata as well as nondeterministic tiling constructions used in DNA computing. In the second and main part, by using the stellar resolution, we formalise and extend ideas of a new alternative to proof-net theory sketched by Girard in his transcendental syntax programme. In particular, we encode both cut-elimination and logical correctness for the multiplicative fragment of linear logic (MLL). We finally obtain completeness results for both MLL and MLL extended with the so-called MIX rule. By extending the ideas of Girard's geometry of interaction, this suggests a first step towards a new understanding of the interplay between logic and computation where linear logic is seen as a (constructed) way to format computation.

preprint2022arXiv

mwp-Analysis Improvement and Implementation: Realizing Implicit Computational Complexity

Implicit Computational Complexity (ICC) drives better understanding of complexity classes, but it also guides the development of resources-aware languages and static source code analyzers. Among the methods developed, the mwp-flow analysis certifies polynomial bounds on the size of the values manipulated by an imperative program. This result is obtained by bounding the transitions between states instead of focusing on states in isolation, as most static analyzers do, and is not concerned with termination or tight bounds on values. Those differences, along with its built-in compositionality, make the mwp-flow analysis a good target for determining how ICC-inspired techniques diverge compared with more traditional static analysis methods. This paper's contributions are threefold: we fine-tune the internal machinery of the original analysis to make it tractable in practice; we extend the analysis to function calls and leverage its machinery to compute the result of the analysis efficiently; and we implement the resulting analysis as a lightweight tool to automatically perform data-size analysis of C programs. This documented effort prepares and enables the development of certified complexity analysis, by transforming a costly analysis into a tractable program, that furthermore decorrelates the problem of deciding if a bound exist with the problem of computing it.

preprint2022arXiv

Realizing Implicit Computational Complexity

This abstract aims at presenting an ongoing effort to apply a novel typing mechanism stemming from Implicit Computational Complexity (ICC), that tracks dependencies between variables in three different ways, at different stages of maturation.The first and third projects bend the original typing discipline to gain finer-grained view on statements independence, to optimize loops by hoisting invariant and by splitting loops "horizontally" to parallelize them more efficiently.The second project refines and implements the original analysis to obtain a fast, modular static analyzer.All three projects aims at pushing the original type system, inspired from ICC, to its limits, to assess how ICC can in practice leads to original, sometimes orthogonal, approaches.

preprint2021arXiv

Lower bounds for algebraic machines, semantically

This paper presents a new semantic method for proving lower bounds in computational complexity. We use it to prove that maxflow, a PTIME complete problem, is not computable in polylogarithmic time on parallel random access machines (PRAMs) working with integers, showing that NCZ \neq PTIME, where NCZ is the complexity class defined by such machines, and PTIME is the standard class of polynomial time computable problems (on, say, a Turing machine). On top of showing this new separation result, we show our method captures previous lower bounds results from the literature: Steele and Yao's lower bounds for algebraic decision trees, Ben-Or's lower bounds for algebraic computation trees, Cucker's proof that NC is not equal to PTIME on the reals, and Mulmuley's lower bounds for "PRAMs without bit operations".

preprint2020arXiv

Probabilistic Complexity Classes through Semantics

In a recent paper, the author has shown how Interaction Graphs models for linear logic can be used to obtain implicit characterisations of non-deterministic complexity classes. In this paper, we show how this semantic approach to Implicit Complexity Theory (ICC) can be used to characterise deterministic and probabilistic models of computation. In doing so, we obtain correspondences between group actions and both deterministic and probabilistic hierarchies of complexity classes. As a particular case, we provide the first implicit characterisations of the classes PLogspace (un-bounded error probabilistic logarithmic space) and PPtime (unbounded error probabilistic polynomial time)

preprint2020arXiv

Stellar Resolution: Multiplicatives

We present a new asynchronous model of computation named Stellar Resolution based on first-order unification. This model of computation is obtained as a formalisation of Girard's transcendental syntax programme, sketched in a series of three articles. As such, it is the first step towards a proper formal treatment of Girard's proposal to tackle first-order logic in a proofs-as-program approach. After establishing formal definitions and basic properties of stellar resolution, we explain how it generalises traditional models of computation, such as logic programming and combinatorial models such as Wang tilings. We then explain how it can represent multiplicative proof-structures, their cut-elimination and the correctness criterion of Danos and Regnier. Further use of realisability techniques lead to dynamic semantics for Multiplicative Linear Logic, following previous Geometry of Interaction models.

preprint2016arXiv

From Dynamic to Static Semantics, Quantitatively

We exhibit a new relationship between dynamic and static semantics. We define the categorical outlay needed to define Interaction Graphs models, a generalisation of Girard's Geometry of Interaction models, which strongly relate to game semantics. We then show how this category is mapped to weighted relational models of linear logic. This brings into vision a new bridge between the dynamic and static approaches, and provides formal grounds for considering interaction graphs models as quantitative versions of GoI and game semantics models. We finally proceed to show how the interaction graphs models relate to a very general notion of quantitative coherence spaces.

preprint2016arXiv

Interaction Graphs: Full Linear Logic

Interaction graphs were introduced as a general, uniform, construction of dynamic models of linear logic, encompassing all "Geometry of Interaction" (GoI) constructions introduced so far. This series of work was inspired from Girard's hyperfinite GoI, and develops a quantitative approach that should be understood as a dynamic version of weighted relational models. Until now, the interaction graphs framework has been shown to deal with exponentials for the constrained system ELL (Elementary Linear Logic) while keeping its quantitative aspect. Adapting older constructions by Girard, one can clearly define "full" exponentials, but at the cost of these quantitative features. We show here that allowing interpretations of proofs to use continuous (yet finite in a measure-theoretic sense) sets of states, as opposed to earlier Interaction Graphs constructions were these sets of states were discrete (and finite), provides a model for full linear logic with second order quantification.

preprint2016arXiv

Interaction Graphs: Nondeterministic Automata

This paper exhibits a series of semantic characterisations of sublinear nondeterministic complexity classes. These results fall into the general domain of logic-based approaches to complexity theory and so-called implicit computational complexity (ICC), i.e. descriptions of complexity classes without reference to specific machine models. In particular, it relates strongly to ICC results based on linear logic since the semantic framework considered stems from work on the latter. Moreover, the obtained characterisations are of a geometric nature: each class is characterised by a specific action of a group by measure-preserving maps.

preprint2015arXiv

A Correspondence between Maximal Abelian Sub-Algebras and Linear Logic Fragments

We show a correspondence between a classification of maximal abelian sub-algebras (MASAs) proposed by Jacques Dixmier and fragments of linear logic. We expose for this purpose a modified construction of Girard's hyperfinite geometry of interaction which interprets proofs as operators in a von Neumann algebra. The expressivity of the logic soundly interpreted in this model is dependent on properties of a MASA which is a parameter of the interpretation. We also unveil the essential role played by MASAs in previous geometry of interaction constructions.

preprint2015arXiv

Characterizing co-NL by a group action

In a recent paper, Girard proposes to use his recent construction of a geometry of interaction in the hyperfinite factor in an innovative way to characterize complexity classes. We begin by giving a detailed explanation of both the choices and the motivations of Girard's definitions. We then provide a complete proof that the complexity class co-NL can be characterized using this new approach. We introduce as a technical tool the non-deterministic pointer machine, a concrete model to computes algorithms.

preprint2015arXiv

Interaction Graphs: Additives

Geometry of Interaction (GoI) is a kind of semantics of linear logic proofs that aims at accounting for the dynamical aspects of cut-elimination. We present here a parametrized construction of a Geometry of Interaction for Multiplicative Additive Linear Logic (MALL) in which proofs are represented by families of directed weighted graphs. Contrarily to former constructions dealing with additive connectives, we are able to solve the known issue of obtaining a denotational semantics for MALL by introducing a notion of observational equivalence. Moreover, our setting has the advantage of being the first construction dealing with additives where proofs of MALL are interpreted by finite objects. The fact that we obtain a denotational model of MALL relies on a single geometric property, which we call the trefoil property, from which we obtain, for each value of the parameter, adjunctions. We then proceed to show how this setting is related to Girard's various constructions: particular choices of the parameter respectively give a combinatorial version of his latest GoI, a refined version of older Geometries of Interaction based on nilpotency. This shows the importance of the trefoil property underlying our constructions since all known GoI construction to this day rely on particular cases of it.

preprint2015arXiv

Interaction Graphs: Graphings

In two previous papers, we exposed a combinatorial approach to the program of Geometry of Interaction, a program initiated by Jean-Yves Girard. The strength of our approach lies in the fact that we interpret proofs by simpler structures - graphs - than Girard's constructions, while generalizing the latter since they can be recovered as special cases of our setting. This third paper extends this approach by considering a generalization of graphs named graphings, which is in some way a geometric realization of a graph. This very general framework leads to a number of new models of multiplicative-additive linear logic which generalize Girard's geometry of interaction models and opens several new lines of research. As an example, we exhibit a family of such models which account for second-order quantification without suffering the same limitations as Girard's models.

preprint2015arXiv

Memoization for Unary Logic Programming: Characterizing PTIME

We give a characterization of deterministic polynomial time computation based on an algebraic structure called the resolution semiring, whose elements can be understood as logic programs or sets of rewriting rules over first-order terms. More precisely, we study the restriction of this framework to terms (and logic programs, rewriting rules) using only unary symbols. We prove it is complete for polynomial time computation, using an encoding of pushdown automata. We then introduce an algebraic counterpart of the memoization technique in order to show its PTIME soundness. We finally relate our approach and complexity results to complexity of logic programming. As an application of our techniques, we show a PTIME-completeness result for a class of logic programming queries which use only unary function symbols.

preprint2015arXiv

Towards a Complexity-through-Realisability Theory

We explain how recent developments in the fields of realisability models for linear logic -- or geometry of interaction -- and implicit computational complexity can lead to a new approach of implicit computational complexity. This semantic-based approach should apply uniformly to various computational paradigms, and enable the use of new mathematical methods and tools to attack problem in computational complexity. This paper provides the background, motivations and perspectives of this complexity-through-realisability theory to be developed, and illustrates it with recent results.

preprint2014arXiv

Logic Programming and Logarithmic Space

We present an algebraic view on logic programming, related to proof theory and more specifically linear logic and geometry of interaction. Within this construction, a characterization of logspace (deterministic and non-deterministic) computation is given via a synctactic restriction, using an encoding of words that derives from proof theory. We show that the acceptance of a word by an observation (the counterpart of a program in the encoding) can be decided within logarithmic space, by reducing this problem to the acyclicity of a graph. We show moreover that observations are as expressive as two-ways multi-heads finite automata, a kind of pointer machines that is a standard model of logarithmic space computation.

preprint2013arXiv

Fully-abstract concurrent games for pi

We define a semantics for Milner's pi-calculus, with three main novelties. First, it provides a fully-abstract model for fair testing equivalence, whereas previous semantics covered variants of bisimilarity and the may and must testing equivalences. Second, it is based on reduction semantics, whereas previous semantics were based on labelled transition systems. Finally, it has a strong game semantical flavor in the sense of Hyland-Ong and Nickau. Indeed, our model may both be viewed as an innocent presheaf semantics and as a concurrent game semantics.

preprint2012arXiv

Interaction Graphs: Multiplicatives

We introduce a graph-theoretical representation of proofs of multiplicative linear logic which yields both a denotational semantics and a notion of truth. For this, we use a locative approach (in the sense of ludics) related to game semantics and the Danos-Regnier interpretation of GoI operators as paths in proof nets. We show how we can retrieve from this locative framework both a categorical semantics for MLL with distinct units and a notion of truth. Moreover, we show how a restricted version of our model can be reformulated in the exact same terms as Girard's latest geometry of interaction. This shows that this restriction of our framework gives a combinatorial approach to J.-Y. Girard's geometry of interaction in the hyperfinite factor, while using only graph-theoretical notions.