Source author record

Thomas Rea

Thomas Rea appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Machine Learning and Feature Engineering for Predicting Pulse Status during Chest Compressions

Objective: Current resuscitation protocols require pausing chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to check for a pulse. However, pausing CPR during a pulseless rhythm can worsen patient outcome. Our objective is to design an ECG-based algorithm that predicts pulse status during uninterrupted CPR and evaluate its performance. Methods: We evaluated 383 patients being treated for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using defibrillator data. We collected paired and immediately adjacent ECG segments having an organized rhythm. Segments were collected during the 10s period of ongoing CPR prior to a pulse check, and 5s segments without CPR during the pulse check. ECG segments with or without a pulse were identified by the audio annotation of a paramedic's pulse check findings and recorded blood pressures. We developed an algorithm to predict the clinical pulse status based on the wavelet transform of the bandpass-filtered ECG, applying principle component analysis. We then trained a linear discriminant model using 3 principle component modes. Model performance was evaluated on test group segments with and without CPR using receiver operating curves and according to the initial arrest rhythm. Results: There were 230 patients (540 pulse checks) in the training set and 153 patients (372 pulse checks) in the test set. Overall 38% (351/912) of checks had a spontaneous pulse. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for predicting pulse status with and without CPR on test data were 0.84 and 0.89, respectively. Conclusion: A novel ECG-based algorithm demonstrates potential to improve resuscitation by predicting presence of a spontaneous pulse without pausing CPR. Significance: Our algorithm predicts pulse status during uninterrupted CPR, allowing for CPR to proceed unimpeded by pauses to check for a pulse and potentially improving resuscitation performance.