Researcher profile

Thomas Howson

Thomas Howson contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The effects of driving time scales on coronal heating in a stratified atmosphere

Aims: We investigate the atmospheric response to coronal heating driven by random flows with different characteristic time scales and amplitudes. Methods: We conducted a series of 3D MHD simulations of random driving imposed on a gravitationally stratified model of the solar atmosphere. In order to understand differences between alternating current (AC) and direct current (DC) heating, we considered the effects of changing the characteristic time scales of the imposed velocities. We also investigated the effects of the magnitude of the velocity driving. Results: Complex foot point motions lead to a proliferation of current sheets and energy dissipation throughout the corona. For a given amplitude, DC driving typically leads to a greater rate of energy injection when compared to AC driving. This leads to the formation of larger currents, increased heating rates and higher temperatures in DC simulations. There is no difference in the spatial distribution of energy dissipation across simulations, however, energy release events in AC cases tend to be more frequent and last for less time. Higher velocity driving is associated with larger currents, higher temperatures and the corona occupying a larger fraction of the simulation volume. In all cases, most of heating is associated with small energy release events, which occur much more frequently than large events. Conclusions: When combined with observational results showing a greater abundance of power in low frequency modes, these findings suggest that energy release in the corona is likely to be driven by long time scale motions. In the corona, AC and DC driving will occur concurrently and their effects remain difficult to isolate. The distribution of field line temperatures and the asymmetry of temperature profiles may reveal the frequency and longevity of energy release events and therefore the relative importance of AC and DC heating.

preprint2020arXiv

Phase mixing and wave heating in a complex coronal plasma

Aims. We investigate the formation of small scales and the dissipation of MHD wave energy through non-linear interactions of counter-propagating, phase-mixed Alfvenic waves in a complex magnetic field. Methods. We conducted fully 3-D, non-ideal MHD simulations of transverse waves in complex magnetic fields. Continuous wave drivers were imposed on the foot points of magnetic field lines and the system was evolved for several Alfven travel times. Phase-mixed waves were allowed to reflect off the upper boundary and the interactions between the resultant counter-streaming wave packets were analysed. Results. The complex nature of the background magnetic field encourages the development of phase mixing, leading to a growth in currents and vorticities. Counter-propagating phase-mixed waves induce a cascade of energy to small scales and result in more efficient energy dissipation. This effect is enhanced in simulations with more complex magnetic fields. High-frequency drivers excite localised field line resonances and produce efficient wave heating. However, this relies on the formation of large amplitude oscillations on resonant field lines. Drivers with smaller frequencies than the fundamental frequencies of field lines are not able to excite resonances and thus do not inject sufficient Poynting flux to power coronal heating. Even in the case of high-frequency oscillations, the rate of dissipation is likely too slow to balance coronal energy losses, even within the quiet Sun. Conclusions. For the generalised phase-mixing presented here, complex background field structures enhance the rate of wave energy dissipation. However, it remains difficult for realistic wave drivers to inject sufficient Poynting flux to heat the corona. Indeed, significant heating only occurs in cases which exhibit amplitudes that are much larger than those currently observed in the solar atmosphere.