BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Thomas Göhrt

Thomas Göhrt contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCeess.SYmath.DSSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Generating a robustly stabilizable class of nonlinear systems for the converse optimality problem

Converse optimality theory addresses an optimal control problem conversely where the system is unknown and the value function is chosen. Previous work treated this problem both in continuous and discrete time and non-extensively considered disturbances. In this paper, the converse optimality theory is extended to the class of affine systems with disturbances in continuous time while considering norm constraints on both control inputs and disturbances. The admissibility theorem and the design of the internal dynamics model are generalized in this context. A robust stabilizability condition is added for the initial converse optimality probelm using inverse optimality tool: the robust control Lyapunov function. A design for nonlinear class of systems that are both robustly stabilizable and globally asymptotically stable in open loop is obtained. A case study illustrates the presented theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Half-Gain Tuning for Active Disturbance Rejection Control

A new tuning rule is introduced for linear active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), which results in similar closed-loop dynamics as the commonly employed bandwidth parameterization design, but with lower feedback gains. In this manner the noise sensitivity of the controller is reduced, paving the way for using ADRC in more noise-affected applications. It is proved that the proposed tuning gains, while rooted in the analytical solution of an algebraic Riccati equation, can always be obtained from a bandwidth parameterization design by simply halving the gains. This establishes a link between optimal control and pole placement design.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A reinforcement learning method with closed-loop stability guarantee

Reinforcement learning (RL) in the context of control systems offers wide possibilities of controller adaptation. Given an infinite-horizon cost function, the so-called critic of RL approximates it with a neural net and sends this information to the controller (called "actor"). However, the issue of closed-loop stability under an RL-method is still not fully addressed. Since the critic delivers merely an approximation to the value function of the corresponding infinite-horizon problem, no guarantee can be given in general as to whether the actor's actions stabilize the system. Different approaches to this issue exist. The current work offers a particular one, which, starting with a (not necessarily smooth) control Lyapunov function (CLF), derives an online RL-scheme in such a way that practical semi-global stability property of the closed-loop can be established. The approach logically continues the work of the authors on parameterized controllers and Lyapunov-like constraints for RL, whereas the CLF now appears merely in one of the constraints of the control scheme. The analysis of the closed-loop behavior is done in a sample-and-hold (SH) manner thus offering a certain insight into the digital realization. The case study with a non-holonomic integrator shows the capabilities of the derived method to optimize the given cost function compared to a nominal stabilizing controller.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stacked adaptive dynamic programming with unknown system model

Adaptive dynamic programming is a collective term for a variety of approaches to infinite-horizon optimal control. Common to all approaches is approximation of the infinite-horizon cost function based on dynamic programming philosophy. Typically, they also require knowledge of a dynamical model of the system. In the current work, application of adaptive dynamic programming to a system whose dynamical model is unknown to the controller is addressed. In order to realize the control algorithm, a model of the system dynamics is estimated with a Kalman filter. A stacked control scheme to boost the controller performance is suggested. The functioning of the new approach was verified in simulation and compared to the baseline represented by gradient descent on the running cost.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access