Researcher profile

Theodoros K. Dikaliotis

Theodoros K. Dikaliotis contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Network Equivalence in the Presence of an Eavesdropper

We consider networks of noisy degraded wiretap channels in the presence of an eavesdropper. For the case where the eavesdropper can wiretap at most one channel at a time, we show that the secrecy capacity region, for a broad class of channels and any given network topology and communication demands, is equivalent to that of a corresponding network where each noisy wiretap channel is replaced by a noiseless wiretap channel. Thus in this case there is a separation between wiretap channel coding on each channel and secure network coding on the resulting noiseless network. We show with an example that such separation does not hold when the eavesdropper can access multiple channels at the same time, for which case we provide upper and lower bounding noiseless networks.

preprint2012arXiv

On the Delay Advantage of Coding in Packet Erasure Networks

We consider the delay of network coding compared to routing with retransmissions in packet erasure networks with probabilistic erasures. We investigate the sub-linear term in the block delay required for unicasting $n$ packets and show that there is an unbounded gap between network coding and routing. In particular, we show that delay benefit of network coding scales at least as $\sqrt{n}$. Our analysis of the delay function for the routing strategy involves a major technical challenge of computing the expectation of the maximum of two negative binomial random variables. This problem has been studied previously and we derive the first exact characterization which may be of independent interest. We also use a martingale bounded differences argument to show that the actual coding delay is tightly concentrated around its expectation.

preprint2011arXiv

Low-Complexity Near-Optimal Codes for Gaussian Relay Networks

We consider the problem of information flow over Gaussian relay networks. Similar to the recent work by Avestimehr \emph{et al.} [1], we propose network codes that achieve up to a constant gap from the capacity of such networks. However, our proposed codes are also computationally tractable. Our main technique is to use the codes of Avestimehr \emph{et al.} as inner codes in a concatenated coding scheme.

preprint2010arXiv

Multiple Access Network Information-flow And Correction codes

The network communication scenario where one or more receivers request all the information transmitted by different sources is considered. We introduce distributed polynomial-time network codes in the presence of malicious nodes. Our codes can achieve any point inside the rate region of multiple-source multicast transmission scenarios both in the cases of coherent and non-coherent network coding. For both cases the encoding and decoding algorithm runs in poly(|E|)exp(s) time, where poly(|E|) is a polynomial function of the number of edges |E| in the network and exp(s) is an exponential function of the number of sources s. Our codes are fully distributed and different sources require no knowledge of the data transmitted by their peers. Our codes are "end-to-end", that is, all nodes apart from the sources and the receivers are oblivious to the adversaries present in the network and simply implement random linear network coding.