BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tesshu Hanaka

Tesshu Hanaka contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Framework to Design Approximation Algorithms for Finding Diverse Solutions in Combinatorial Problems

Finding a \emph{single} best solution is the most common objective in combinatorial optimization problems. However, such a single solution may not be applicable to real-world problems as objective functions and constraints are only "approximately" formulated for original real-world problems. To solve this issue, finding \emph{multiple} solutions is a natural direction, and diversity of solutions is an important concept in this context. Unfortunately, finding diverse solutions is much harder than finding a single solution. To cope with difficulty, we investigate the approximability of finding diverse solutions. As a main result, we propose a framework to design approximation algorithms for finding diverse solutions, which yields several outcomes including constant-factor approximation algorithms for finding diverse matchings in graphs and diverse common bases in two matroids and PTASes for finding diverse minimum cuts and interval schedulings.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Computing Densest $k$-Subgraph with Structural Parameters

\textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph} is the problem to find a vertex subset $S$ of size $k$ such that the number of edges in the subgraph induced by $S$ is maximized. In this paper, we show that \textsc{Densest $k$-Subgraph} is fixed parameter tractable when parameterized by neighborhood diversity, block deletion number, distance-hereditary deletion number, and cograph deletion number, respectively. Furthermore, we give a $2$-approximation $2^{\tc(G)/2}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm where $\tc(G)$ is the twin cover number of an input graph $G$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Hedonic Games and Treewidth Revisited

We revisit the complexity of the well-studied notion of Additively Separable Hedonic Games (ASHGs). Such games model a basic clustering or coalition formation scenario in which selfish agents are represented by the vertices of an edge-weighted digraph $G=(V,E)$, and the weight of an arc $uv$ denotes the utility $u$ gains by being in the same coalition as $v$. We focus on (arguably) the most basic stability question about such a game: given a graph, does a Nash stable solution exist and can we find it efficiently? We study the (parameterized) complexity of ASHG stability when the underlying graph has treewidth $t$ and maximum degree $Δ$. The current best FPT algorithm for this case was claimed by Peters [AAAI 2016], with time complexity roughly $2^{O(Δ^5t)}$. We present an algorithm with parameter dependence $(Δt)^{O(Δt)}$, significantly improving upon the parameter dependence on $Δ$ given by Peters, albeit with a slightly worse dependence on $t$. Our main result is that this slight performance deterioration with respect to $t$ is actually completely justified: we observe that the previously claimed algorithm is incorrect, and that in fact no algorithm can achieve dependence $t^{o(t)}$ for bounded-degree graphs, unless the ETH fails. This, together with corresponding bounds we provide on the dependence on $Δ$ and the joint parameter establishes that our algorithm is essentially optimal for both parameters, under the ETH. We then revisit the parameterization by treewidth alone and resolve a question also posed by Peters by showing that Nash Stability remains strongly NP-hard on stars under additive preferences. Nevertheless, we also discover an island of mild tractability: we show that Connected Nash Stability is solvable in pseudo-polynomial time for constant $t$, though with an XP dependence on $t$ which, as we establish, cannot be avoided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

(In)approximability of Maximum Minimal FVS

We study the approximability of the NP-complete \textsc{Maximum Minimal Feedback Vertex Set} problem. Informally, this natural problem seems to lie in an intermediate space between two more well-studied problems of this type: \textsc{Maximum Minimal Vertex Cover}, for which the best achievable approximation ratio is $\sqrt{n}$, and \textsc{Upper Dominating Set}, which does not admit any $n^{1-ε}$ approximation. We confirm and quantify this intuition by showing the first non-trivial polynomial time approximation for \textsc{Max Min FVS} with a ratio of $O(n^{2/3})$, as well as a matching hardness of approximation bound of $n^{2/3-ε}$, improving the previous known hardness of $n^{1/2-ε}$. The approximation algorithm also gives a cubic kernel when parameterized by the solution size. Along the way, we also obtain an $O(Δ)$-approximation and show that this is asymptotically best possible, and we improve the bound for which the problem is NP-hard from $Δ\ge 9$ to $Δ\ge 6$. Having settled the problem's approximability in polynomial time, we move to the context of super-polynomial time. We devise a generalization of our approximation algorithm which, for any desired approximation ratio $r$, produces an $r$-approximate solution in time $n^{O(n/r^{3/2})}$. This time-approximation trade-off is essentially tight: we show that under the ETH, for any ratio $r$ and $ε>0$, no algorithm can $r$-approximate this problem in time $n^{O((n/r^{3/2})^{1-ε})}$, hence we precisely characterize the approximability of the problem for the whole spectrum between polynomial and sub-exponential time, up to an arbitrarily small constant in the second exponent.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A (probably) optimal algorithm for Bisection on bounded-treewidth graphs

The maximum/minimum bisection problems are, given an edge-weighted graph, to find a bipartition of the vertex set into two sets whose sizes differ by at most one, such that the total weight of edges between the two sets is maximized/minimized. Although these two problems are known to be NP-hard, there is an efficient algorithm for bounded-treewidth graphs. In particular, Jansen et al. (SIAM J. Comput. 2005) gave an $O(2^tn^3)$-time algorithm when given a tree decomposition of width $t$ of the input graph, where $n$ is the number of vertices of the input graph. Eiben et al. (ESA 2019) improved the dependency of $n$ in the running time by giving an $O(8^tt^5n^2\log n)$-time algorithm. Moreover, they showed that there is no $O(n^{2-\varepsilon})$-time algorithm for trees under some reasonable complexity assumption. In this paper, we show an $O(2^t(tn)^2)$-time algorithm for both problems, which is asymptotically tight to their conditional lower bound. We also show that the exponential dependency of the treewidth is asymptotically optimal under the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Finally, we discuss the (in)tractability of both problems with respect to special graph classes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Computing the Largest Bond and the Maximum Connected Cut of a Graph

The cut-set $\partial(S)$ of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the set of edges that have one endpoint in $S\subset V$ and the other endpoint in $V\setminus S$, and whenever $G[S]$ is connected, the cut $[S,V\setminus S]$ of $G$ is called a connected cut. A bond of a graph $G$ is an inclusion-wise minimal disconnecting set of $G$, i.e., bonds are cut-sets that determine cuts $[S,V\setminus S]$ of $G$ such that $G[S]$ and $G[V\setminus S]$ are both connected. Contrasting with a large number of studies related to maximum cuts, there exist very few results regarding the largest bond of general graphs. In this paper, we aim to reduce this gap on the complexity of computing the largest bond, and the maximum connected cut of a graph. Although cuts and bonds are similar, we remark that computing the largest bond and the maximum connected cut of a graph tends to be harder than computing its maximum cut. We show that it does not exist a constant-factor approximation algorithm to compute the largest bond, unless P = NP. Also, we show that {\sc Largest Bond} and {\sc Maximum Connected Cut} are NP-hard even for planar bipartite graphs, whereas \textsc{Maximum Cut} is trivial on bipartite graphs and polynomial-time solvable on planar graphs. In addition, we show that {\sc Largest Bond} and {\sc Maximum Connected Cut} are NP-hard on split graphs, and restricted to graphs of clique-width $w$ they can not be solved in time $f(w)\times n^{o(w)}$ unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, but they can be solved in time $f(w)\times n^{O(w)}$. Finally, we show that both problems are fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the size of the solution, the treewidth, and the twin-cover number.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Complexity of $(A,\ell)$-Path Packing

Given a graph $G = (V,E)$, $A \subseteq V$, and integers $k$ and $\ell$, the \textsc{$(A,\ell)$-Path Packing} problem asks to find $k$ vertex-disjoint paths of length $\ell$ that have endpoints in $A$ and internal points in $V \setminus A$. We study the parameterized complexity of this problem with parameters $|A|$, $\ell$, $k$, treewidth, pathwidth, and their combinations. We present sharp complexity contrasts with respect to these parameters. Among other results, we show that the problem is polynomial-time solvable when $\ell \le 3$, while it is NP-complete for constant $\ell \ge 4$. We also show that the problem is W[1]-hard parameterized by pathwidth${}+|A|$, while it is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by treewidth${}+\ell$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Orientable Deletion

A graph is $d$-orientable if its edges can be oriented so that the maximum in-degree of the resulting digraph is at most $d$. $d$-orientability is a well-studied concept with close connections to fundamental graph-theoretic notions and applications as a load balancing problem. In this paper we consider the d-ORIENTABLE DELETION problem: given a graph $G=(V,E)$, delete the minimum number of vertices to make $G$ $d$-orientable. We contribute a number of results that improve the state of the art on this problem. Specifically: - We show that the problem is W[2]-hard and $\log n$-inapproximable with respect to $k$, the number of deleted vertices. This closes the gap in the problem's approximability. - We completely characterize the parameterized complexity of the problem on chordal graphs: it is FPT parameterized by $d+k$, but W-hard for each of the parameters $d,k$ separately. - We show that, under the SETH, for all $d,ε$, the problem does not admit a $(d+2-ε)^{tw}$, algorithm where $tw$ is the graph's treewidth, resolving as a special case an open problem on the complexity of PSEUDOFOREST DELETION. - We show that the problem is W-hard parameterized by the input graph's clique-width. Complementing this, we provide an algorithm running in time $d^{O(d\cdot cw)}$, showing that the problem is FPT by $d+cw$, and improving the previously best known algorithm for this case.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access