Researcher profile

Tejin Cai

Tejin Cai contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Comparison of optical potential for nucleons and $Δ$ resonances

Precise modeling of neutrino interactions on nuclear targets is essential for neutrino oscillations experiments. The modeling of the energy of final state particles in quasielastic (QE) scattering and resonance production on bound nucleons requires knowledge of both the removal energy of the initial state bound nucleon as well as the average Coulomb and nuclear optical potentials for final state leptons and hadrons. We extract the average values of the real part of the nuclear optical potential for final state nucleons ($U_{opt}^{QE}$) as a function of the nucleon kinetic energy from inclusive electron scattering data on nuclear targets ($\bf_{6}^{12}C$+$\bf_{8}^{16}O$, $\bf_{20}^{40}Ca$+$\bf_{18}^{40}Ar$, $\bf_{3}^{6}Li$, $\bf_{18}^{27}Al$, $\bf_{26}^{56}Fe$, $\bf_{82}^{208}Pb$) in the QE region and compare to calculations. We also extract values of the average of the real part of the nuclear optical potential for a $Δ(1232)$ resonance in the final state ($U^Δ_{opt}$) within the impulse approximation. We find that $U^Δ_{opt}$ is more negative than $U_{opt}^{QE}$ with $U^Δ_{opt}\approx$1.5~$U_{opt}^{QE}$ for $\bf_{6}^{12}C$.

preprint2018arXiv

Optical Potential and Removal Energies in Lepton Nucleus Scattering

We summarize some of the results presented in arXiv:1801.07975 [nucl-th]\cite{FSIpaper}(to be published in EPJC in 2018) on modeling electron and neutrino QE scattering on a variety of nuclei within the impulse approximation. We find that with three parameters we can describe the final state lepton energy for all of available electron QE data on Lithium, Carbon+Oxygen, Aluminum, Calcium+Argon, Iron and Lead+Gold. The first parameter, the removal energy $ε^{P,N}$ is extracted from exclusive ee$^{\prime}$p spectral function data. The second parameter $V_{eff}$, which accounts for the interaction of final state leptons and protons with the Coulomb potential of the nucleus, is available from published comparisons of inclusive QE electron and positron cross section. We extract the third parameter $U_{FSI}(\vec {q}_3^2)$, which accounts for the interaction of the final state nucleon with the optical potential of the spectator nucleus (FSI), by fitting all available inclusive QE cross sections on nuclear targets. Here $q_3$ is the three momentum transfer. With these three parameters we can model the energy of final state electrons and nucleons for all available electron QE scattering data. At present the uncertainty in the value of the removal energy parameters is a the largest source of systematic error in the extraction of the neutrino oscillation parameter $Δ{m}^2$. The use of the updated parameters in neutrino Monte Carlo generators reduces the systematic uncertainty in the combined removal energy (with FSI corrections) from $\pm$ 20 MeV to $\pm$ 5 MeV. In this short contribution we only summarize the results for Carbon+Oxygen and Calcium+Argon