Researcher profile

Taylor P. Reynolds

Taylor P. Reynolds contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Dual Quaternion Based Powered Descent Guidance with State-Triggered Constraints

This paper presents a numerical algorithm for computing 6-degree-of-freedom free-final-time powered descent guidance trajectories. The trajectory generation problem is formulated using a unit dual quaternion representation of the rigid body dynamics, and several standard path constraints. Our formulation also includes a special line of sight constraints that is enforced only within a specified band of slant ranges relative to the landing site, a novel feature that is especially relevant to Terrain and Hazard Relative Navigation. We use the newly introduced state-triggered constraints to formulate these range constraints in a manner that is amenable to real-time implementations. The resulting non-convex optimal control problem is solved iteratively as a sequence of convex second-order cone programs that locally approximate the non-convex problem. Each second-order cone program is solved using a customizable interior point method solver. Also introduced are a scaling method and a new heuristic technique that guide the convergence process towards dynamic feasibility. To demonstrate the capabilities of our algorithm, two numerical case studies are presented. The first studies the effect of including a slant-range-triggered line of sight constraint on the resulting trajectories. The second study performs a Monte Carlo analysis to assess the algorithm's robustness to initial conditions and real-time performance.

preprint2018arXiv

Successive Convexification for Real-Time 6-DoF Powered Descent Guidance with State-Triggered Constraints

In this paper, we present a real-time successive convexification algorithm for a generalized free-final-time 6-degree-of-freedom powered descent guidance problem. We build on our previous work by introducing the following contributions: (i) a free-ignition-time modification that allows the algorithm to determine the optimal engine ignition time, (ii) a tractable aerodynamics formulation that models both lift and drag, and (iii) a continuous state-triggered constraint formulation that emulates conditionally enforced constraints. In particular, contribution (iii) effectively allows constraints to be enabled or disabled by if-statements conditioned on the solution variables of the parent continuous optimization problem. To the best of our knowledge, this represents a novel formulation in the optimal control literature, and enables a number of interesting applications, including velocity-triggered angle of attack constraints and range-triggered line of sight constraints. Our algorithm converts the resulting generalized powered descent guidance problem from a non-convex free-final-time optimal control problem into a sequence of tractable convex second-order cone programming subproblems. With the aid of virtual control and trust region modifications, these subproblems are solved in succession until convergence is attained. Simulations using a third-party solver demonstrate the real-time capabilities of the proposed algorithm, with a maximum execution time of less than 0.7 seconds over a multitude of problem feature combinations.