BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tatsuya Matsumoto

Tatsuya Matsumoto contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SRastro-ph.COastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
10works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

10 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite (AXIS) Community Science Book

The AXIS Community Science Book represents the collective effort of 592 scientists worldwide to define the transformative science enabled by the Advanced X-ray Imaging Satellite (AXIS), a next-generation X-ray mission selected by NASA's Astrophysics Probe Program for Phase A study. AXIS will advance the legacy of high-angular-resolution X-ray astronomy with ~1.5'' imaging over a wide 24' field of view and an order of magnitude greater collecting area than Chandra in the 0.3-12 keV band. Combining sharp imaging, high throughput, and rapid response capabilities, AXIS will open new windows on virtually every aspect of modern astrophysics, exploring the birth and growth of supermassive black holes, the feedback processes that shape galaxies, the life cycles of stars and exoplanet environments, and the nature of compact stellar remnants, supernova remnants, and explosive transients. This book compiles 138 community-contributed science cases developed by five Science Working Groups focused on AGN and supermassive black holes, galaxy evolution and feedback, compact objects and supernova remnants, stellar physics and exoplanets, and time-domain and multi-messenger astrophysics. Together, these studies establish the scientific foundation for next-generation X-ray exploration in the 2030s and highlight strong synergies with facilities of the 2030s, such as JWST, Roman, Rubin/LSST, SKA, ALMA, ngVLA, and next-generation gravitational-wave and neutrino networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Supernova Precursor Emission and the Origin of Pre-Explosion Stellar Mass-Loss

A growing number of core collapse supernovae (SNe) which show evidence for interaction with dense circumstellar material (CSM) are accompanied by "precursor" optical emission rising weeks to months prior to the explosion. The precursor luminosities greatly exceed the Eddington limit of the progenitor star, implying they are accompanied by substantial mass-loss. Here, we present a semi-analytic model for SN precursor light curves which we apply to constrain the properties and mechanisms of the pre-explosion mass-loss. We explore two limiting mass-loss scenarios: (1) an "eruption" arising from shock break-out following impulsive energy deposition below the stellar surface; (2) a steady "wind" due to sustained heating of the progenitor envelope. The eruption model, which resembles a scaled-down version of Type IIP SNe, can explain the luminosities and timescales of well-sampled precursors, for ejecta masses $\sim 0.1-1\,M_{\odot}$ and velocities $\sim 100-1000\,\rm km\,s^{-1}$. By contrast, the steady-wind scenario cannot explain the highest precursor luminosities $\gtrsim10^{41}\,\rm erg\,s^{-1}$, under the constraint that the total ejecta mass not exceed the entire progenitor mass (though the less-luminous SN 2020tlf precursor can be explained by a mass-loss rate $\sim1\,M_{\odot}\,\rm yr^{-1}$). However, shock interaction between the wind and pre-existing (earlier ejected) CSM may boost its radiative efficiency and mitigate this constraint. In both eruption and wind scenarios the precursor ejecta forms compact ($\lesssim10^{15}$ cm) optically-thick CSM at the time of core collapse; though only directly observable via rapid post-explosion spectroscopy ($\lesssim$ few days before being overtaken by the SN ejecta), this material can boost the SN luminosity via shock interaction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

What powers the radio emission in TDE AT2019dsg: a long-lived jet or the disruption itself?

The tidal disruption event AT2019dsg was observed from radio to X-rays and was possibly accompanied by a high-energy neutrino. Previous interpretations have focused on continued injection by a central engine as the source of energy for radio emission. We show that continuous energy injection is unnecessary; the radio data can be explained by a single ejection of plasma that supplies all the energy needed. To support this assertion, we analyze the synchrotron self-absorbed spectra in terms of the equipartition model. Similar to previous analyses, we find that the energy in the radio-emitting region increases approximately $\propto t^{0.7}$ and the lengthscale of this region grows $\propto t$ at a rate $\simeq0.06c$. This event resembles the earliest stage of a supernova remnant: because the ejected mass is much greater than the shocked external mass, its velocity remains unchanged, while the energy in shocked gas grows with time. The radio-emitting material gains energy from the outflow, not continuing energy injection by the central object. Although energy injection from an accreting BH cannot be completely excluded, the energy injection rate is very different from the fallback luminosity, and maintaining constant outflow velocity requires fine-tuning demanding further physical explanation. If the neutrino association is real, the energy injection needed is much greater than for the radio emission, suggesting that the detected neutrino did not arise from the radio-emitting region.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Limits on mass outflow from optical tidal disruption events

The discovery of optical/UV tidal disruption events (TDEs) was surprising. The expectation was that, upon returning to the pericenter, the stellar-debris stream will form a compact disk that will emit soft X-rays. Indeed the first TDEs were discovered in this energy band. A common explanation for the optical/UV events is that surrounding optically-thick matter reprocesses the disk's X-ray emission and emits it from a large photosphere. If accretion follows the super-Eddington mass infall rate it would inevitably result in an energetic outflow, providing naturally the reprocessing matter. We describe here a new method to estimate, using the observed luminosity and temperature, the mass and energy of outflows from optical transients. When applying this method to a sample of supernovae our estimates are consistent with a more detailed hydrodynamic modeling. For the current sample of a few dozen optical TDEs the observed luminosity and temperature imply outflows that are significantly more massive than typical stellar masses, posing a problem to this common reprocessing picture.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Generalized compactness limit from an arbitrary viewing angle

A $γ$-ray source must have a limited optical depth to pair production. This simple condition, called compactness, implies that gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) must involve a highly relativistic motion ($Γ\gtrsim 100$) giving the first and most important clue on their nature. So far, this condition has been discussed under the assumption that the $γ$-ray sources are viewed on-axis, that is, by an observer within the beaming cone of the relativistic source. Recently, following the detection of the weak short GRB 170817A, an extensive interest arose in the possibility that some $γ$-ray sources are viewed off-axis. We generalize here the compactness formalism for an arbitrary viewing angle taking several possible opacity processes and $γ$-ray spectra into account. We find that for a given observables (peak luminosity, temporal variability, and spectra) the minimal Lorentz factor, $Γ_{\rm min}$, is obtained, as expected, for an on-axis observer. More remarkably we find that compactness dictates also a maximal viewing angle, $θ_{\rm max} \simeq 1/2Γ_{\rm min}$. Our limit implies for regular GRBs a very small allowed viewing angle ($\lesssim10^{-2}\,\rm rad$), making it extremely unlikely that they are viewed off-axis. For GRB 170817A we confirm earlier results that rule out the possibility that the observed $γ$-rays were seen by an on-axis observer as a regular short GRB. The short GRB 150101B was also suggested to be an off-axis event. We show that its maximal viewing angle $\lesssim0.05\,\rm rad$, which is inconsistent with the off-axis model. Finally we show that for low luminosity GRBs, compactness does not exclude by itself an off-axis model, but when combined with other consideration this option is strongly disfavored.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Linking extended and plateau emissions of short gamma-ray bursts

Some short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) show a longer lasting emission phase, called extended emission (EE) lasting $\sim 10^{2-3}\,\rm s$, as well as a plateau emission (PE) lasting $\sim10^{4-5}\,\rm s$. While a long-lasting activity of the central engines is a promising explanation for powering both emissions, their physical origin and their emission mechanisms are still uncertain. In this work, we study the properties of the EEs and their connection with the PEs. First, we constrain the minimal Lorentz factor $Γ$ of the outflows powering EEs, using compactness arguments and find that the outflows should be relativistic, $Γ\gtrsim10$. We propose a consistent scenario for the PEs, where the outflow eventually catches up with the jet responsible for the prompt emission, injecting energy into the forward shock formed by the prior jet, which naturally results in a PE. We also derive the radiation efficiency of EEs and the Lorentz factor of the outflow within our scenario for 10 well-observed SGRBs accompanied by both EE and PE. The efficiency has an average value of $\sim3\,\%$ but shows a broad distribution ranging from $\sim0.01$ to $\sim100\%$. The Lorentz factor is $\sim20-30$, consistent with the compactness arguments. These results suggest that EEs are produced by a slower outflow via more inefficient emission than the faster outflow which causes the prompt emission with a high radiation efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On short GRBs similar to GRB 170817A detected by Fermi GBM

von Kienlin et al. (2019) selected 11 short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs) whose characteristics are similar to GRB 170817A. These bursts, like GRB 170817A, have a hard spike followed by a soft thermal tail. However, as their redshifts are unknown it is not clear if their luminosities are as low as that of GRB 170817A. Comparing the positions in the $ε_{\rm p}$-$E_{\rmγ,iso}$ (spectral peak energy - isotropic-equivalent energy) plane and using compactness arguments to estimate the minimal Lorentz factor, $Γ$, we find that all the bursts in this sample are consistent with being regular sGRBs if they are located at $z\simeq0.3-3$. They are also consistent with being similar to GRB 170817A if they are located at $z\lesssim0.1$. Even in the latter case, the events must involve at least mildly relativistic ($Γ\gtrsim 2$) motion within the sources. We, further, find that at most one or two bursts in the sample are consistent with the cocoon shock-breakout model. Finally, we calculate the event rate of either off-axis emission from a jet core or from a jet-wing (surrounding the core). We find that the off-axis emission model as an origin of the sample is rejected as it predicts too small event rate. The wing model can be consistent with the observed rate but the model parameters cannot be constrained by the current observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The origin of hotspots around Sgr A*: Orbital or pattern motion?

The Gravity Collaboration detected a near-infrared hotspot moving around Sgr A* during the 2018 July 22 flare. They fitted the partial loop the hotspot made on the sky with a circular Keplerian orbit of radius $\simeq7.5\,r_{\rm g}$ around the supermassive black hole (BH), where $r_{\rm g}$ is the gravitational radius. However, because the hotspot traversed the loop in a short time, models in which the hotspot tracks the motion of some fluid element tend to produce a best-fit trajectory smaller than the observed loop. This is true for a circular Keplerian orbit, even when BH spin is accounted for, and for motion along a RIAF streamline. A marginally bound geodesic suffers from the same problem; in addition, it is not clear what the origin of an object following the geodesic would be. The observed hotspot motion is more likely a pattern motion. Circular motion with $r\simeq12.5\,r_{\rm g}$ and a super-Keplerian speed $\simeq0.8\,c$ is a good fit. Such motion must be pattern motion because it cannot be explained by physical forces. The pattern speed is compatible with magnetohydrodynamic perturbations, provided that the magnetic field is sufficiently strong. Circular pattern motion of radius $\sim20\, r_{\rm g}$ on a plane above the BH is an equally good alternative; in this case, the hotspot may be caused by a precessing outflow interacting with a surrounding disk. As all our fits have relatively large radii, we cannot constrain the BH spin using these observations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Jet-powered supernovae of $\sim 10^5\,M_{\odot}$ population III stars are observable by $Euclid$, $WFIRST$, $WISH$, and $JWST$

Supermassive black holes observed at high redshift $z\gtrsim6$ could grow from direct collapse black holes (DCBHs) with mass $\sim10^5\,M_{\odot}$, which result from the collapse of supermassive stars (SMSs). If a relativistic jet is launched from a DCBH, it can break out of the collapsing SMS and produce a gamma-ray burst (GRB). Although most of the GRB jets are off-axis from our line of sight, we show that the energy injected from the jet into a cocoon is huge $\sim10^{55-56}\,{\rm{erg}}$, so that the cocoon fireball is observed as ultra-luminous supernovae of $\sim10^{45-46}\rm{\,erg\,s^{-1}}$ for $\sim5000 [(1+z)/16] \rm{\,days}$. They are detectable by the future telescopes with near infrared bands, such as, $Euclid$, $WFIRST$, $WISH$, and $JWST$ up to $z\sim20$ and $\sim 100$ events per year, providing a direct evidence of the DCBH scenario.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Can direct collapse black holes launch gamma-ray bursts and grow to supermassive black holes?

The existence of black holes (BHs) of mass ~ 10^{9} M_sun at z > 6 is a big puzzle in astrophysics because even optimistic estimates of the accretion time are insufficient for stellar mass BHs of ~ 10 M_sun to grow into such supermassive BHs. A resolution of this puzzle might be the direct collapse of supermassive stars with mass M ~ 10^{5} M_sun into massive seed BHs. We find that if a jet is launched from the accretion disk around the central BH, the jet can break out the star because of the structure of the radiation pressure-dominated envelope. Such ultra-long gamma-ray bursts with duration of ~ 10^{4} - 10^{6} s and flux of 10^{-11} - 10^{-8} erg s^{-1} cm^{-2} could be detectable by Swift. We estimate an event rate of < 1yr^{-1}. The total explosion energy is > 10^{55} - 10^{56} erg. The resulting negative feedback delays the growth of the remnant BH by about 70 Myr or evacuates the host galaxy completely.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access