Researcher profile

Tao-Ming Wang

Tao-Ming Wang contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

On Complexities of Minus Domination

A function f: V \rightarrow \{-1,0,1\} is a minus-domination function of a graph G=(V,E) if the values over the vertices in each closed neighborhood sum to a positive number. The weight of f is the sum of f(x) over all vertices x \in V. The minus-domination number γ^{-}(G) is the minimum weight over all minus-domination functions. The size of a minus domination is the number of vertices that are assigned 1. In this paper we show that the minus-domination problem is fixed-parameter tractable for d-degenerate graphs when parameterized by the size of the minus-dominating set and by d. The minus-domination problem is polynomial for graphs of bounded rankwidth and for strongly chordal graphs. It is NP-complete for splitgraphs. Unless P=NP there is no fixed-parameter algorithm for minus-domination. 79,1 5%

preprint2013arXiv

Set Representations of Linegraphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. A family $\mathcal{S}$ of nonempty sets $\{S_1,\ldots,S_n\}$ is a set representation of $G$ if there exists a one-to-one correspondence between the vertices $v_1, \ldots, v_n$ in $V(G)$ and the sets in $\mathcal{S}$ such that $v_iv_j \in E(G)$ if and only if $S_i\cap S_j\neq \es$. A set representation $\mathcal{S}$ is a distinct (respectively, antichain, uniform and simple) set representation if any two sets $S_i$ and $S_j$ in $\mathcal{S}$ have the property $S_i\neq S_j$ (respectively, $S_i\nsubseteq S_j$, $|S_i|=|S_j|$ and $|S_i\cap S_j|\leqslant 1$). Let $U(\mathcal{S})=\bigcup_{i=1}^n S_i$. Two set representations $\mathcal{S}$ and $\mathcal{S}'$ are isomorphic if $\mathcal{S}'$ can be obtained from $\mathcal{S}$ by a bijection from $U(\mathcal{S})$ to $U(\mathcal{S}')$. Let $F$ denote a class of set representations of a graph $G$. The type of $F$ is the number of equivalence classes under the isomorphism relation. In this paper, we investigate types of set representations for linegraphs. We determine the types for the following categories of set representations: simple-distinct, simple-antichain, simple-uniform and simple-distinct-uniform.