Source author record

Tanmay Inamdar

Tanmay Inamdar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FPT Approximations for Connected Maximum Coverage

We revisit connectivity-constrained coverage through a unifying model, Partial Connected Red-Blue Dominating Set. Given a red-blue bipartite graph $G$ and an auxiliary connectivity graph $G_{conn}$ on red vertices, and integers $k, t$, the task is to find a $k$-sized subset of red vertices that dominates at least $t$ blue vertices, and that induces a connected subgraph in $G_{conn}$. This formulation captures connected variants of Max Coverage, Partial Dominating Set, and Partial Vertex Cover studied in prior literature. After identifying (parameterized) inapproximability results inherited from known problems, we first show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable by $t$. Furthermore, when the bipartite graph excludes $K_{d,d}$ as a subgraph, we design (resp. efficient) parameterized approximation schemes for approximating $t$ (resp. $k$). Notably, these FPT approximations do not impose any restrictions on $G_{conn}$. Together, these results chart the boundary between hardness and FPT-approximability for connectivity-constrained coverage.

preprint2023arXiv

Proportionally Fair Matching with Multiple Groups

The study of fair algorithms has become mainstream in machine learning and artificial intelligence due to its increasing demand in dealing with biases and discrimination. Along this line, researchers have considered fair versions of traditional optimization problems including clustering, regression, ranking and voting. However, most of the efforts have been channeled into designing heuristic algorithms, which often do not provide any guarantees on the quality of the solution. In this work, we study matching problems with the notion of proportional fairness. Proportional fairness is one of the most popular notions of group fairness where every group is represented up to an extent proportional to the final selection size. Matching with proportional fairness or more commonly, proportionally fair matching, was introduced in [Chierichetti et al., AISTATS, 2019], where the problem was studied with only two groups. However, in many practical applications, the number of groups -- although often a small constant -- is larger than two. In this work, we make the first step towards understanding the computational complexity of proportionally fair matching with more than two groups. We design exact and approximation algorithms achieving reasonable guarantees on the quality of the matching as well as on the time complexity. Our algorithms are also supported by suitable hardness bounds.

preprint2022arXiv

Exact Exponential Algorithms for Clustering Problems

In this paper we initiate a systematic study of exact algorithms for well-known clustering problems, namely $k$-Median and $k$-Means. In $k$-Median, the input consists of a set $X$ of $n$ points belonging to a metric space, and the task is to select a subset $C \subseteq X$ of $k$ points as centers, such that the sum of the distances of every point to its nearest center is minimized. In $k$-Means, the objective is to minimize the sum of squares of the distances instead. It is easy to design an algorithm running in time $\max_{k\leq n} {n \choose k} n^{O(1)} = O^*(2^n)$ ($O^*(\cdot)$ notation hides polynomial factors in $n$). We design first non-trivial exact algorithms for these problems. In particular, we obtain an $O^*((1.89)^n)$ time exact algorithm for $k$-Median that works for any value of $k$. Our algorithm is quite general in that it does not use any properties of the underlying (metric) space -- it does not even require the distances to satisfy the triangle inequality. In particular, the same algorithm also works for $k$-Means. We complement this result by showing that the running time of our algorithm is asymptotically optimal, up to the base of the exponent. That is, unless ETH fails, there is no algorithm for these problems running in time $2^{o(n)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$. Finally, we consider the "supplier" versions of these clustering problems, where, in addition to the set $X$ we are additionally given a set of $m$ candidate centers $F$, and objective is to find a subset of $k$ centers from $F$. The goal is still to minimize the $k$-Median/$k$-Means/$k$-Center objective. For these versions we give a $O(2^n (mn)^{O(1)})$ time algorithms using subset convolution. We complement this result by showing that, under the Set Cover Conjecture, the supplier versions of these problems do not admit an exact algorithm running in time $2^{(1-ε) n} (mn)^{O(1)}$.

preprint2016arXiv

Measures and slaloms

We examine measure-theoretic properties of spaces constructed using certain technique of Todorčević. We show that the existence of strictly positive measures on such spaces depends on combinatorial properties of certain families of slaloms. As a corollary we get that if $\mathrm{add}(\mathcal{N}) = \mathrm{non}(\mathcal{M})$ then there is a non-separable space which supports a measure and which cannot be mapped continuously onto $[0,1]^{ω_1}$. Also, without any additional axioms we prove that there is a non-separable growth of $ω$ supporting a measure and that there is a compactification $L$ of $ω$ with growth of such properties and such that the natural copy of $c_0$ is complemented in $C(L)$. Finally, we discuss examples of spaces not supporting measures but satisfying quite strong chain conditions. Our main tool is a characterization due to Kamburelis of Boolean algebras supporting measures in terms of their chain conditions in generic extensions by a measure algebra.