BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Tanmay Inamdar

Tanmay Inamdar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithms

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

FPT Approximations for Connected Maximum Coverage

We revisit connectivity-constrained coverage through a unifying model, Partial Connected Red-Blue Dominating Set. Given a red-blue bipartite graph $G$ and an auxiliary connectivity graph $G_{conn}$ on red vertices, and integers $k, t$, the task is to find a $k$-sized subset of red vertices that dominates at least $t$ blue vertices, and that induces a connected subgraph in $G_{conn}$. This formulation captures connected variants of Max Coverage, Partial Dominating Set, and Partial Vertex Cover studied in prior literature. After identifying (parameterized) inapproximability results inherited from known problems, we first show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable by $t$. Furthermore, when the bipartite graph excludes $K_{d,d}$ as a subgraph, we design (resp. efficient) parameterized approximation schemes for approximating $t$ (resp. $k$). Notably, these FPT approximations do not impose any restrictions on $G_{conn}$. Together, these results chart the boundary between hardness and FPT-approximability for connectivity-constrained coverage.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2023arXiv

Proportionally Fair Matching with Multiple Groups

The study of fair algorithms has become mainstream in machine learning and artificial intelligence due to its increasing demand in dealing with biases and discrimination. Along this line, researchers have considered fair versions of traditional optimization problems including clustering, regression, ranking and voting. However, most of the efforts have been channeled into designing heuristic algorithms, which often do not provide any guarantees on the quality of the solution. In this work, we study matching problems with the notion of proportional fairness. Proportional fairness is one of the most popular notions of group fairness where every group is represented up to an extent proportional to the final selection size. Matching with proportional fairness or more commonly, proportionally fair matching, was introduced in [Chierichetti et al., AISTATS, 2019], where the problem was studied with only two groups. However, in many practical applications, the number of groups -- although often a small constant -- is larger than two. In this work, we make the first step towards understanding the computational complexity of proportionally fair matching with more than two groups. We design exact and approximation algorithms achieving reasonable guarantees on the quality of the matching as well as on the time complexity. Our algorithms are also supported by suitable hardness bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Exact Exponential Algorithms for Clustering Problems

In this paper we initiate a systematic study of exact algorithms for well-known clustering problems, namely $k$-Median and $k$-Means. In $k$-Median, the input consists of a set $X$ of $n$ points belonging to a metric space, and the task is to select a subset $C \subseteq X$ of $k$ points as centers, such that the sum of the distances of every point to its nearest center is minimized. In $k$-Means, the objective is to minimize the sum of squares of the distances instead. It is easy to design an algorithm running in time $\max_{k\leq n} {n \choose k} n^{O(1)} = O^*(2^n)$ ($O^*(\cdot)$ notation hides polynomial factors in $n$). We design first non-trivial exact algorithms for these problems. In particular, we obtain an $O^*((1.89)^n)$ time exact algorithm for $k$-Median that works for any value of $k$. Our algorithm is quite general in that it does not use any properties of the underlying (metric) space -- it does not even require the distances to satisfy the triangle inequality. In particular, the same algorithm also works for $k$-Means. We complement this result by showing that the running time of our algorithm is asymptotically optimal, up to the base of the exponent. That is, unless ETH fails, there is no algorithm for these problems running in time $2^{o(n)} \cdot n^{O(1)}$. Finally, we consider the "supplier" versions of these clustering problems, where, in addition to the set $X$ we are additionally given a set of $m$ candidate centers $F$, and objective is to find a subset of $k$ centers from $F$. The goal is still to minimize the $k$-Median/$k$-Means/$k$-Center objective. For these versions we give a $O(2^n (mn)^{O(1)})$ time algorithms using subset convolution. We complement this result by showing that, under the Set Cover Conjecture, the supplier versions of these problems do not admit an exact algorithm running in time $2^{(1-ε) n} (mn)^{O(1)}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access