Source author record

Tanja Auge

Tanja Auge appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

ChaTEAU: A Universal Toolkit for Applying the Chase

What do applications like semantic optimization, data exchange and integration, answering queries under dependencies, query reformulation with constraints, and data cleaning have in common? All these applications can be processed by the Chase, a family of algorithms for reasoning with constraints. While the theory of the Chase is well understood, existing implementations are confined to specific use cases and application scenarios, making it difficult to reuse them in other settings. ChaTEAU overcomes this limitation: It takes the logical core of the Chase, generalizes it, and provides a software library for different Chase applications in a single toolkit.

preprint2021arXiv

Privacy Aspects of Provenance Queries

Given a query result of a big database, why-provenance can be used to calculate the necessary part of this database, consisting of so-called witnesses. If this database consists of personal data, privacy protection has to prevent the publication of these witnesses. This implies a natural conflict of interest between publishing original data (provenance) and protecting these data (privacy). In this paper, privacy goes beyond the concept of personal data protection. The paper gives an extended definition of privacy as intellectual property protection. If the provenance information is not sufficient to reconstruct a query result, additional data such as witnesses or provenance polynomials have to be published to guarantee traceability. Nevertheless, publishing this provenance information might be a problem if (significantly) more tuples than necessary can be derived from the original database. At this point, it is already possible to violate privacy policies, provided that quasi identifiers are included in this provenance information. With this poster, we point out fundamental problems and discuss first proposals for solutions.