Source author record

Tanisha Pandey

Tanisha Pandey appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

What's Kooking? Characterizing India's Emerging Social Network, Koo

Social media has grown exponentially in a short period, coming to the forefront of communications and online interactions. Despite their rapid growth, social media platforms have been unable to scale to different languages globally and remain inaccessible to many. In this paper, we characterize Koo, a multilingual micro-blogging site that rose in popularity in 2021, as an Indian alternative to Twitter. We collected a dataset of 4.07 million users, 163.12 million follower-following relationships, and their content and activity across 12 languages. We study the user demographic along the lines of language, location, gender, and profession. The prominent presence of Indian languages in the discourse on Koo indicates the platform's success in promoting regional languages. We observe Koo's follower-following network to be much denser than Twitter's, comprising of closely-knit linguistic communities. An N-gram analysis of posts on Koo shows a #KooVsTwitter rhetoric, revealing the debate comparing the two platforms. Our characterization highlights the dynamics of the multilingual social network and its diverse Indian user base.

preprint2022arXiv

Why Did You Not Compare With That? Identifying Papers for Use as Baselines

We propose the task of automatically identifying papers used as baselines in a scientific article. We frame the problem as a binary classification task where all the references in a paper are to be classified as either baselines or non-baselines. This is a challenging problem due to the numerous ways in which a baseline reference can appear in a paper. We develop a dataset of $2,075$ papers from ACL anthology corpus with all their references manually annotated as one of the two classes. We develop a multi-module attention-based neural classifier for the baseline classification task that outperforms four state-of-the-art citation role classification methods when applied to the baseline classification task. We also present an analysis of the errors made by the proposed classifier, eliciting the challenges that make baseline identification a challenging problem.