Source author record

Takayuki Ohgami

Takayuki Ohgami appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Optical follow-up observation for GW event S190510g using Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam

A gravitational wave event, S190510g, which was classified as a binary-neutron-star coalescence at the time of preliminary alert, was detected by LIGO/Virgo collaboration on May 10, 2019. At 1.7 hours after the issue of its preliminary alert, we started a target-of-opportunity imaging observation in Y-band to search for its optical counterpart using the Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) on the Subaru Telescope. The observation covers a 118.8 deg$^2$ sky area corresponding to 11.6% confidence in the localization skymap released in the preliminary alert and 1.2% in the updated skymap. We divided the observed area into two fields based on the availability of HSC reference images. For the fields with the HSC reference images, we applied an image subtraction technique; for the fields without the HSC reference images, we sought individual HSC images by matching a catalog of observed objects with the PS1 catalog. The search depth is 22.28 mag in the former method and the limit of search depth is 21.3 mag in the latter method. Subsequently, we performed visual inspection and obtained 83 candidates using the former method and 50 candidates using the latter method. Since we have only the 1-day photometric data, we evaluated probability to be located inside the 3D skymap by estimating their distances with photometry of associated extended objects. We found three candidates are likely located inside the 3D skymap and concluded they could be an counterpart of S190510g, while most of 133 candidates were likely to be supernovae because the number density of candidates was consistent with the expected number of supernova detections. By comparing our observational depth with a light curve model of such a kilonova reproducing AT2017gfo, we show that early-deep observations with the Subaru/HSC can capture the rising phase of blue component of kilonova at the estimated distance of S190510g (~230 Mpc).

preprint2020arXiv

Constraints on the dark mass distribution surrounding Sgr A*: simple $χ^2$ analysis for the redshift of photons from orbiting stars

Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*) is the central supermassive black hole with the mass $\sim 4\times 10^6 M_{\odot}$ in the Milky Way and stars are orbiting around it. In May 2018, one of the nearest stars to Sgr A* named S0-2/S2 experienced the pericenter passage. The redshift of photons from S0-2 had varied from $4000\>{\rm km\>s^{-1}}$ to $-2000\>{\rm km\>s^{-1}}$ during the pericenter passage, which is within $0.5\>{\rm yr}$. In this paper, we show that this steep variation of the redshift gives a strong constraint on a dark mass distribution inside the orbit of S0-2. By applying a simple $χ^2$ analysis to the observed redshift, we can easily distinguish between the two models, the point mass model and the point mass plus an extended mass model without the best-fitting parameter search. Our redshift data during the pericenter passage in 2018 with Subaru/IRCS bound the amount of the extended mass inside the orbit of S0-2 less than $0.5\,\%$ ($\sim 2 \times 10^4 M_\odot$) of the mass of Sgr A*. This constraint obtained by our simple analysis is comparable to previous works with the best-fitting parameter search to the motion of S0-2 including the effect of the extended mass. We consider both the power-law and the Plummer models for the dark mass distribution model, but the significant difference between these results is not found.