Researcher profile

T. Reinhold

T. Reinhold contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - Baseline
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Effect of metallicity on the detectability of rotational periods in solar-like stars

Accurate determination of stellar rotation periods is important for estimating stellar ages as well as for understanding stellar activity and evolution. While for about thirty thousand stars in the Kepler field rotation periods can be determined, there are over hundred thousand stars, especially with low photometric variability and irregular pattern of variations, for which rotational periods are unknown. Here, we investigate the effect of metallicity on the detectability of rotation periods. This is done by synthesising light curves of hypothetical stars, which are identical to our Sun, with the exception of the metallicity. These light curves are then used as an input to the period determination algorithms. We find that the success rate for recovering the rotation signal has a minimum close to the solar metallicity value. This can be explained by the compensation effect of facular and spot contributions. In addition, selecting solar-like stars with near-solar effective temperature, near solar photometric variability, and with metallicity between M/H = -0.35 and M/H = 0.35 from the Kepler sample, we analyse the fraction of stars for which rotational periods have been detected as a function of metallicity. In agreement with our theoretical estimate we found a local minimum for the detection fraction close to the solar metallicity. We further report rotation periods of 87~solar-like Kepler stars for the first time.

preprint2020arXiv

Reply to the comment of T. Metcalfe and J. van Saders on the Science report "The Sun is less active than other solar-like stars"

This is our reply to the comment of T. Metcalfe and J. van Saders on the Science report "The Sun is less active than other solar-like stars" by T. Reinhold, A. I. Shapiro, S. K. Solanki, B. T. Montet, N. A. Krivova, R. H. Cameron, E. M. Amazo-Gomez. We hope that both the comment and our reply lead to fruitful discussions which of the two presented scenarios is more likely.

preprint2020arXiv

Rotation periods from the inflection point in the power spectrum of stellar brightness variations: II. The Sun

Young and active stars generally have regular, almost sinusoidal, patterns of variability attributed to their rotation, while the majority of older and less active stars, including the Sun, have more complex and non-regular light-curves which do not have clear rotational-modulation signals. Consequently, the rotation periods have been successfully determined only for a small fraction of the Sun-like stars observed by transit-based planet-hunting missions, such as CoRoT, Kepler, and TESS. This suggests that only a small fraction of such systems have been properly identified as solar-like analogs. We apply a new method for determining rotation periods of low-activity stars, like the Sun. The method is based on calculating the gradient of the power spectrum (GPS) of stellar brightness variations and identifying a tell-tale inflection point in the spectrum. The rotation frequency is then proportional to the frequency of that inflection point. In this paper test this GPS method against available photometric records of the Sun. We apply GPS, autocorrelation functions, Lomb-Scargle periodograms, and wavelet analyses to the total solar irradiance (TSI) time series obtained from the Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) on the Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) and the Variability of solar IRradiance and Gravity Oscillations (VIRGO) experiment on the SOlar and Heliospheric Observatory (SoHO) missions. We analyse the performance of all methods at various levels of solar activity. We show that the GPS method returns accurate values of solar rotation independently of the level of solar activity. In particular, it performs well during periods of high solar activity, when TSI variability displays an irregular pattern and other methods fail. Our results suggest that the GPS method can successfully determine the rotational periods of stars with both regular and non-regular light-curves.

preprint2015arXiv

A method to discriminate solar and antisolar differential rotation in high-precision light curves

Surface differential rotation (DR) is one major ingredient of the magnetic field generation process in the Sun and likely in other stars. The term solar-like differential rotation describes the observation that solar equatorial regions rotate faster than polar ones. The opposite effect of polar regions rotating faster than equatorial ones (termed as antisolar DR) has only been observed in a few stars, although there is evidence from theoretical dynamo models. We present a new method to detect the sign of DR (i.e. solar-like or antisolar DR) by analyzing long-term high-precision light curves with the Lomb-Scargle periodogram.We compute the Lomb-Scargle periodogram and identify a set of significant periods $P_k$, which we associate with active regions located at different latitudes on the the stellar surface. If detectable, the first harmonics ($P_k'$) of these periods were identified to compute their peak-height-ratios $r_k:=h(P_k')/h(P_k)$. Spots rotating at lower latitudes generate less sine-shaped light curves, which requires additional power in the harmonics, and results in larger ratios $r_k$. Comparing different ratios $r_k$ and the associated periods $P_k$ yields information about the spot latitudes, and reveals the sign of DR. We tested our method on different sets of synthetic light curves all exhibiting solar-like DR. The number of cases where our method detects antisolar DR is the false-positive rate of our method. Depending on the set of light curves, the noise level, the required minimum peak separation, and the presence or absence of spot evolution, our method fails to detect the correct sign in at most 20%. We applied our method to 50 Kepler G stars and found 21-34 stars with solar-like DR and 5-10 stars with antisolar DR, depending on the minimum peak separation.

preprint2015arXiv

Testing the recovery of stellar rotation signals from Kepler light curves using a blind hare-and-hounds exercise

We present the results of a blind exercise to test the recoverability of stellar rotation and differential rotation in Kepler light curves. The simulated light curves lasted 1000 days and included activity cycles, Sun-like butterfly patterns, differential rotation and spot evolution. The range of rotation periods, activity levels and spot lifetime were chosen to be representative of the Kepler data of solar like stars. Of the 1000 simulated light curves, 770 were injected into actual quiescent Kepler light curves to simulate Kepler noise. The test also included five 1000-day segments of the Sun's total irradiance variations at different points in the Sun's activity cycle. Five teams took part in the blind exercise, plus two teams who participated after the content of the light curves had been released. The methods used included Lomb-Scargle periodograms and variants thereof, auto-correlation function, and wavelet-based analyses, plus spot modelling to search for differential rotation. The results show that the `overall' period is well recovered for stars exhibiting low and moderate activity levels. Most teams reported values within 10% of the true value in 70% of the cases. There was, however, little correlation between the reported and simulated values of the differential rotation shear, suggesting that differential rotation studies based on full-disk light curves alone need to be treated with caution, at least for solar-type stars. The simulated light curves and associated parameters are available online for the community to test their own methods.