Researcher profile

T. J. Jopek

T. J. Jopek contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

astro-ph.EP astro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - Baseline

2works

0followers

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2023arXiv

New Nomenclature Rules for Meteor Showers Adopted

The Shower Database (SD) of the Meteor Data Center (MDC) had been operating on the basis of stream-naming rules which were too complex and insufficiently precise for 15 years. With a gradual increase in the number of discovered meteor showers, the procedure for submitting new showers to the database and naming them lead to situations that were inconsistent with the fundamental role of the SD - the disambiguation of stream names in the scientific literature. Our aim is to simplify the meteor shower nomenclature rules. We propose a much simpler set of meteor shower nomenclature rules, based on a two-stage approach, similar to those used in the case of asteroids. The first stage applies to a new shower just after its discovery. The second stage concerns the repeatedly observed shower, the existence of which no longer raises any doubts. Our proposed new procedure was approved by a vote of the commission F1 of the IAU in July 2022.

preprint2021arXiv

Remarks on generating realistic synthetic meteoroid orbits

Context. To identify the real associations of small bodies, we can use synthetic sets of orbits generated by various methods. These are not perfect methods, therefore the assessment of their quality is an essential task. Aims. In this study, we compared five methods for generating synthetic meteoroid orbits. Three of them (ME0, KD10, and KDns) had already been proposed in the literature, while two additional ones (ME1 and ME4) are new methods. Methods. As far as possible, the synthetic orbits were compared with the orbits of the observed meteoroids. For quantitative comparison, we applied a few tests: the chi-square distance and the nearest neighbor NN_N tests used in previous works, and one-dimensional chi-square and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) tests, as well as a two-dimensional K-S test implemented in this study. To estimate a general property of the orbital sample, we proposed the use of the entropy H_N of the data set based on the nearest neighbor distances. Finally, we did a cluster analysis of the synthetic orbits. We calculated and compared the values of the orbital similarity thresholds. Results. We showed that generating 'realistic' meteoroid orbits and testing their quality is a complex issue. An assessment of the quality of the generated orbits depends on the type of test applied, and it refers to the sample of the observed orbits used. Different tests give different assessments. However, in practice, the investigated methods produced similar results if they were applied correspondingly.