Researcher profile

T. A. A. Sigut

T. A. A. Sigut contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Stellar Inclination Angles from Be Star H$α$ Emission-Line Profiles

We demonstrate that the angle between star's rotation axis and the observer's line-of-sight, usually called the inclination angle, can be reliably determined for Be stars via H$α$ emission-line profile fitting. We test our method on a sample of 11 Be stars with available long-baseline interferometric data from the Navy Precision Optical Interferometer~(NPOI). We fit the H$α$ emission line profile of each star to obtain a spectroscopic inclination angle $i_{\rm Hα}$. We then obtain an independent inclination angle estimate, $i_{\rm V^2}$, by fitting the observed interferometric visibilities with model visibilities based on a purely geometric representation of the light distribution on the sky. The sample differences, $Δi \equiv i_{\rm Hα} - i_{\rm V^2}$, are normally distributed with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of $6.7$ degrees, and the linear correlation coefficient between $i_{\rm Hα}$ and $i_{\rm V^2}$ is $r=0.93$. As Be stars comprise upwards of one fifth of all main-sequence B-type stars, this H$α$ line profile fitting technique has the potential to provide an efficient method for detecting correlated stellar spin axes in young open clusters. Furthermore, if the orientation of the Be star circumstellar disk on the plane of the sky can be constrained by polarization measurements, it is possible to determine the full 3D stellar rotation vector of each Be star.

preprint2020arXiv

The Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Emission Line Survey of Andromeda. I: Classical Be Stars

We present results from a 2-epoch HST H$α$ emission line survey of the Andromeda Galaxy that overlaps the footprint of the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury (PHAT) survey. We find 552 (542) classical Be stars and 8429 (8556) normal B-type stars in epoch # 1 (epoch # 2), yielding an overall fractional Be content of 6.15% $\pm$0.26% (5.96% $\pm$0.25%). The fractional Be content decreased with spectral sub-type from $\sim$23.6% $\pm$2.0% ($\sim$23.9% $\pm$2.0%) for B0-type stars to $\sim$3.1% $\pm$0.34% ($\sim$3.4% $\pm$0.35%) for B8-type stars in epoch # 1 (epoch # 2). We observe a clear population of cluster Be stars at early fractional main sequence lifetimes, indicating that a subset of Be stars emerge onto the ZAMS as rapid rotators. Be stars are 2.8x rarer in M31 for the earliest sub-types compared to the SMC, confirming that the fractional Be content decreases in significantly more metal rich environments (like the Milky Way and M31). However, M31 does not follow a clear trend of Be fraction decreasing with metallicity compared to the Milky Way, which may reflect that the Be phenomenon is enhanced with evolutionary age. The rate of disk-loss or disk-regeneration episodes we observe, 22% $\pm$ 2% yr$^{-1}$, is similar to that observed for seven other Galactic clusters reported in the literature, assuming these latter transient fractions scale by a linear rate. The similar number of disk-loss events (57) as disk-renewal events (43) was unexpected since disk dissipation time-scales can be $\sim$2x the typical time-scales for disk build-up phases.