Researcher profile

Susanna Manrubia

Susanna Manrubia contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

The challenge of scale in molecular adaptation: Local searches in astronomical genotype networks

The exploration of vast genotype spaces poses fundamental challenges for evolving populations. As the number of genotypes encoding viable phenotypes grows exponentially with genome length, populations can only explore a tiny fraction of these immense spaces, a fact consistently supported by empirical and theoretical evidence. Paradoxically, local, mutation-driven searches near abundant sequences allow populations to generate phenotypic improvements and functional innovations despite this immense search space. In this contribution, we integrate insights from viral evolution with theoretical expectations derived from genotype-phenotype maps to re-examine how high-dimensional sequence spaces shape evolutionary dynamics. In resolving the paradox, abundant phenotypes play a crucial role because their combinatorial weight biases evolutionary trajectories. We discuss how this bias, together with limited accessibility of fitness peaks, modifies traditional metaphors -- such as fitness landscapes -- and challenges standard notions of evolutionary optimality. Our results underscore that adaptation is predominantly local yet remarkably efficient, providing a unifying perspective on the coexistence of robustness, innovation, and constrained exploration in molecular evolution.

preprint2021arXiv

From genotypes to organisms: State-of-the-art and perspectives of a cornerstone in evolutionary dynamics

Understanding how genotypes map onto phenotypes, fitness, and eventually organisms is arguably the next major missing piece in a fully predictive theory of evolution. We refer to this generally as the problem of the genotype-phenotype map. Though we are still far from achieving a complete picture of these relationships, our current understanding of simpler questions, such as the structure induced in the space of genotypes by sequences mapped to molecular structures, has revealed important facts that deeply affect the dynamical description of evolutionary processes. Empirical evidence supporting the fundamental relevance of features such as phenotypic bias is mounting as well, while the synthesis of conceptual and experimental progress leads to questioning current assumptions on the nature of evolutionary dynamics-cancer progression models or synthetic biology approaches being notable examples. This work delves into a critical and constructive attitude in our current knowledge of how genotypes map onto molecular phenotypes and organismal functions, and discusses theoretical and empirical avenues to broaden and improve this comprehension. As a final goal, this community should aim at deriving an updated picture of evolutionary processes soundly relying on the structural properties of genotype spaces, as revealed by modern techniques of molecular and functional analysis.

preprint2020arXiv

Predictability: Can the turning point and end of an expanding epidemic be precisely forecast?

No, they can't. Epidemic spread is characterized by exponentially growing dynamics, which are intrinsically unpredictable. The time at which the growth in the number of infected individuals halts and starts decreasing cannot be calculated with certainty before the turning point is actually attained; neither can the end of the epidemic after the turning point. An SIR model with confinement (SCIR) illustrates how lockdown measures inhibit infection spread only above a threshold that we calculate. The existence of that threshold has major effects in predictability: A Bayesian fit to the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain shows that a slow-down in the number of newly infected individuals during the expansion phase allows to infer neither the precise position of the maximum nor whether the measures taken will bring the propagation to the inhibition regime. There is a short horizon for reliable prediction, followed by a dispersion of the possible trajectories that grows extremely fast. The impossibility to predict in the mid-term is not due to wrong or incomplete data, since it persists in error-free, synthetically produced data sets, and does not necessarily improve by using larger data sets. Our study warns against precise forecasts of the evolution of epidemics based on mean-field, effective or phenomenological models, and supports that only probabilities of different outcomes can be confidently given.

preprint2019arXiv

Epistasis between cultural traits drives paradigm shifts in cultural evolution

Every now and then the cultural paradigm of a society changes. Human history can be regarded as a sequence of long periods of cultural stasis punctuated by paradigm shifts that transform culture upside-down over the turn of a few generations. We propose here a population dynamics model devised to analyse paradigm shifts. In this model individuals are defined by a vector of cultural traits that can change mainly through imitation of other individuals' traits. The novelty of the model is that cultural traits may interact reinforcing or hindering each other. Imitation is then biased by the 'cultural fitness' landscape thus defined. Our main result is that abrupt paradigm shifts occur, as a response to weak changes in the landscape, only when cultural traits do interact---whereas adaptation is smooth if there is no interaction. Borrowing the genetic term, this interaction is called 'cultural epistasis'. The result is robust to the way that epistasis is implemented, to whether imitation is biased by homophily, or to changes in other model parameters. Finally, a relevant consequence of this dynamics is the irreversible nature of paradigm shifts: the old paradigm cannot be restored even if the external changes are undone. Our model puts the phenomenon of paradigm shifts in cultural evolution in the same category as catastrophic shifts in ecology or phase transitions in physics.