Source author record

Susan M. Paddock

Susan M. Paddock appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Editorial: Spatial accessibility of pediatric primary healthcare: Measurement and inference

Improving access to health care has long been at the forefront of policy debates in the U.S. There are multiple determinants of healthcare utilization: predisposing characteristics that explain individuals' propensities to use healthcare; enabling characteristics that describe the resources individuals have to use healthcare; and perceived or actual need for healthcare [Aday and Andersen (1974)]. Nobles, Serban and Swann (2014) illustrate the complexity involved with developing an understanding of one determinant of healthcare utilization. They examine spatial accessibility - an enabling characteristic under the aforementioned framework - to primary care pediatricians in Georgia. The authors encounter challenges that arise in many public policy applications, namely, the limitations of the available data, the need to conduct analyses that reflect system constraints, model selection and uncertainty quantification. The Area Editors featured this paper, along with contributions from three discussants, in an AoAS invited session at the 2014 Joint Statistical Meetings and are including the paper and those discussions in this issue because the paper showcases the type of research AoAS aims to publish: analyses requiring innovative statistical thinking to address questions of practical importance.

preprint2014arXiv

Editorial

Clauset and Woodard (2013) ask, "What is the likelihood of another September 11th-sized or larger terrorist event, worldwide, over the next decade?" This question has implications for numerous policy arenas - national security, international relations, public safety, disaster preparedness, and so on - but it also has resonance for any individual who remembers 9/11. Thus, the Area Editors chose this paper to engage the audience at the 2013 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM) in Montreal. The discussions in this issue of The Annals of Applied Statistics include those presented formally at JSM 2013 as well as others from individuals who were unable to attend JSM 2013 or who contributed discussions after the meeting.

preprint2011arXiv

Analysis of rolling group therapy data using conditionally autoregressive priors

Group therapy is a central treatment modality for behavioral health disorders such as alcohol and other drug use (AOD) and depression. Group therapy is often delivered under a rolling (or open) admissions policy, where new clients are continuously enrolled into a group as space permits. Rolling admissions policies result in a complex correlation structure among client outcomes. Despite the ubiquity of rolling admissions in practice, little guidance on the analysis of such data is available. We discuss the limitations of previously proposed approaches in the context of a study that delivered group cognitive behavioral therapy for depression to clients in residential substance abuse treatment. We improve upon previous rolling group analytic approaches by fully modeling the interrelatedness of client depressive symptom scores using a hierarchical Bayesian model that assumes a conditionally autoregressive prior for session-level random effects. We demonstrate improved performance using our method for estimating the variance of model parameters and the enhanced ability to learn about the complex correlation structure among participants in rolling therapy groups. Our approach broadly applies to any group therapy setting where groups have changing client composition. It will lead to more efficient analyses of client-level data and improve the group therapy research community's ability to understand how the dynamics of rolling groups lead to client outcomes.