Source author record

Sulov Chalise

Sulov Chalise appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Broad-band X-ray observation of broad-line radio galaxy 3C 109

We present a study of the central engine in the broad-line radio galaxy 3C 109. To investigate the immediate surrounding of this accreting, supermassive black hole, we perform a multi-epoch broad-band spectral analysis of a joint NuSTAR/XMM observation (2017), an archival xmm observation (2005) and the 105-month averaged Swift-BAT data. We are able to clearly separate the spectrum into a primary continuum, neutral and ionized absorption, and a reflection component. The photon index of the primary continuum has changed since 2005 ($Γ= 1.61 \substack{+0.02 \\ -0.01} \rightarrow 1.54 \pm{0.02}$), while other components remain unchanged, indicative of minimal geometric changes to the central engine. We constrain the high-energy cutoff of 3C 109 (E$_{\text{cut}}= 49 \substack{+7 \\ -5}$\,keV ) for the first time. The reflector is found to be ionized (log $ξ$ = $2.3 \substack{+0.1 \\ -0.2}$) but no relativistic blurring is required by the data. SED analysis confirms the super-Eddington nature of 3C 109 initially ($λ_{Edd} >$ 2.09). However, we do not find any evidence for strong reflection (R = $0.18 \substack{+0.04 \\ -0.03}$) or a steep power law index, as expected from a super-Eddington source. This puts the existing virial mass estimate of 2 $\times 10^{8}$M$_{\odot}$ into question. We explore additional ways of estimating the Eddington ratio, some of which we find to be inconsistent with our initial SED estimate. We obtain a new black hole mass estimate of 9.3 $\times 10^{8}$M$_{\odot}$, which brings all Eddington ratio estimates into agreement and does not require 3C 109 to be super-Eddington.