Source author record

Suhail Sherif

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Computational Complexity

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works

1topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Is this your work?

Open graph Browse papers

preprint2022arXiv

One-way communication complexity and non-adaptive decision trees

We study the relationship between various one-way communication complexity measures of a composed function with the analogous decision tree complexity of the outer function. We consider two gadgets: the AND function on 2 inputs, and the Inner Product on a constant number of inputs. Let $IP$ denote Inner Product on $2b$ bits. - If $f$ is a total Boolean function that depends on all of its inputs, the bounded-error one-way quantum communication complexity of $f \circ IP$ equals $Ω(n(b-1))$ . - If $f$ is a partial Boolean function, the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ IP$ is at least $Ω(b \cdot D_{dt}^{\rightarrow}(f))$ , where $D_{dt}^{\rightarrow}(f)$ denotes the non-adaptive decision tree complexity of $f$ . Montanaro and Osborne [arXiv'09] observed that the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ XOR_2$ equals the non-adaptive parity decision tree complexity of $f$ . In contrast, we show the following with the gadget $AND_2$ . - There exists a function for which even the quantum non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ is exponentially large in the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$ . - For symmetric functions $f$ , the non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ is at most quadratic in the (even two-way) communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$ . In view of the first point, a lower bound on non-adaptive AND decision tree complexity of $f$ does not lift to a lower bound on one-way communication complexity of $f \circ AND_2$ . In our final result we show that for all $f$ , the deterministic one-way communication complexity of $F = f \circ AND_2$ is at most $(rank(M_{F}))(1 - Ω(1))$ , where $M_{F}$ denotes the communication matrix of $F$ . This shows that the rank upper bound on one-way communication complexity (which can be tight in general) is not tight for AND-composed functions.

preprint2020arXiv

Towards Stronger Counterexamples to the Log-Approximate-Rank Conjecture

We give improved separations for the query complexity analogue of the log-approximate-rank conjecture i.e. we show that there are a plethora of total Boolean functions on $n$ input bits, each of which has approximate Fourier sparsity at most $O(n^3)$ and randomized parity decision tree complexity $Θ(n)$ . This improves upon the recent work of Chattopadhyay, Mande and Sherif (JACM '20) both qualitatively (in terms of designing a large number of examples) and quantitatively (improving the gap from quartic to cubic). We leave open the problem of proving a randomized communication complexity lower bound for XOR compositions of our examples. A linear lower bound would lead to new and improved refutations of the log-approximate-rank conjecture. Moreover, if any of these compositions had even a sub-linear cost randomized communication protocol, it would demonstrate that randomized parity decision tree complexity does not lift to randomized communication complexity in general (with the XOR gadget).

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.