Source author record

Steven Geinitz

Steven Geinitz appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works

1topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2013arXiv

Conjugate distributions in hierarchical Bayesian ANOVA for computational efficiency and assessments of both practical and statistical significance

Assessing variability according to distinct factors in data is a fundamental technique of statistics. The method commonly regarded to as analysis of variance (ANOVA) is, however, typically confined to the case where all levels of a factor are present in the data (i.e. the population of factor levels has been exhausted). Random and mixed effects models are used for more elaborate cases, but require distinct nomenclature, concepts and theory, as well as distinct inferential procedures. Following a hierarchical Bayesian approach, a comprehensive ANOVA framework is shown, which unifies the above statistical models, emphasizes practical rather than statistical significance, addresses issues of parameter identifiability for random effects, and provides straightforward computational procedures for inferential steps. Although this is done in a rigorous manner the contents herein can be seen as ideological in supporting a shift in the approach taken towards analysis of variance.

preprint2012arXiv

MMANOVA: A general multilevel framework for multivariate analysis of variance

Classical analysis of variance requires that model terms be labeled as fixed or random and typically culminate by comparing variability from each batch (factor) to variability from errors; without a standard methodology to assess the magnitude of a batch's variability, to compare variability between batches, nor to consider the uncertainty in this assessment. In this paper we support recent work, placing ANOVA into a general multilevel framework, then refine this through batch level model specifications, and develop it further by extension to the multivariate case. Adopting a Bayesian multilevel model parametrization, with improper batch level prior densities, we derive a method that facilitates comparison across all sources of variability. Whereas classical multivariate ANOVA often utilizes a single covariance criterion, e.g. determinant for Wilks' lambda distribution, the method allows arbitrary covariance criteria to be employed. The proposed method also addresses computation. By introducing implicit batch level constraints, which yield improper priors, the full posterior is efficiently factored, thus alleviating computational demands. For a large class of models, the partitioning mitigates, or even obviates the need for methods such as MCMC. The method is illustrated with simulated examples and an application focusing on climate projections with global climate models.