Researcher profile

Stephen J. Warren

Stephen J. Warren contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Galaxy mass profiles from strong lensing II: The elliptical power-law model

We present a systematic analysis of the constraints $σ_γ$ on the mass profile slope $γ$ obtainable when fitting a singular power-law ellipsoid model to a typical strong lensing observation of an extended source. These results extend our previous analysis of circular systems, Paper I. We draw our results from 676 mock observations covering a range of image configurations, each created with a fixed signal to noise ratio $S=100$ in the images. We analyse the results using a combination of theory and a simplified model which identifies the contribution to the constraints of the individual fluxes and positions in each of the lensed images. The main results are: 1. For any lens ellipticity, the constraints $σ_γ$ for two image systems are well described by the results of Paper I, transformed to elliptical coordinates; 2. We derive an analytical expression for $σ_γ$ for systems with the source aligned with the axis of the lens; 3. For both two-image systems and aligned systems, $σ_γ$ is limited by the flux uncertainties; 4. The constraints for off-axis four-image systems are a factor of two to eight better, depending on source size, than for two-image systems, and improve with increasing lens ellipticity. We show that the constraints on $γ$ in these systems derive from the complementary positional information of the images alone, without using flux. The complementarity improves as the offset of the source from the axis increases, such that the best constraints $σ_γ<0.01$, for $S=100$, occur when the source approaches the caustic.

preprint2011arXiv

A luminous quasar at a redshift of z = 7.085

The intergalactic medium was not completely reionized until approximately a billion years after the Big Bang, as revealed by observations of quasars with redshifts of less than 6.5. It has been difficult to probe to higher redshifts, however, because quasars have historically been identified in optical surveys, which are insensitive to sources at redshifts exceeding 6.5. Here we report observations of a quasar (ULAS J112001.48+064124.3) at a redshift of 7.085, which is 0.77 billion years after the Big Bang. ULAS J1120+0461 had a luminosity of 6.3x10^13 L_Sun and hosted a black hole with a mass of 2x10^9 M_Sun (where L_Sun and M_Sun are the luminosity and mass of the Sun). The measured radius of the ionized near zone around ULAS J1120+0641 is 1.9 megaparsecs, a factor of three smaller than typical for quasars at redshifts between 6.0 and 6.4. The near zone transmission profile is consistent with a Ly alpha damping wing, suggesting that the neutral fraction of the intergalactic medium in front of ULAS J1120+0641 exceeded 0.1.

preprint2006arXiv

The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey ZYJHK Photometric System: Passbands and Synthetic Colours

The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey is a set of five surveys of complementary combinations of area, depth, and Galactic latitude, which began in 2005 May. The surveys use the UKIRT Wide Field Camera (WFCAM), which has a solid angle of 0.21deg^2. Here we introduce and characterise the ZYJHK photometric system of the camera, which covers the wavelength range 0.83-2.37 microns. We synthesise response functions for the five passbands, and compute colours in the WFCAM, SDSS and 2MASS bands, for brown dwarfs, stars, galaxies and quasars of different types. We provide a recipe for others to compute colours from their own spectra. Calculations are presented in the Vega system, and the computed offsets to the AB system are provided, as well as colour equations between WFCAM filters and the SDSS and 2MASS passbands. We highlight the opportunities presented by the new Y filter at 0.97-1.07 microns for surveys for hypothetical Y dwarfs (brown dwarfs cooler than T), and for quasars of very--high redshift, z>6.4.

preprint1997arXiv

On the nature of z(abs) ~ z(em) damped absorbers in quasar spectra

We present spectroscopic observations of the damped Ly-alpha absorber at redshift z=1.9342 seen in the spectrum of the quasar Q0151+048A. The redshift of the absorber is greater than the redshift of the quasar, so the system resembles the z(abs) ~ z(em) damped absorber at z=2.81 towards the quasar PKS0528-250. We have previously reported the detection of Ly-alpha emission from the latter absorber, one of only two damped absorbers for which Ly-alpha emission has unambiguously been detected. The resemblance between the PKS0528-250 and Q0151+048A systems is made closer by the detection of a weak emission feature in the trough of the Q0151+048A absorber. This leads us to consider whether these z(abs) ~ z(em) DLA absorbers are different objects to the intervening DLA absorbers. Two possibilities are examined and rejected. Firstly the Q0151+048A and PKS0528-250 z(abs) ~ z(em) absorbers appear to be unrelated to the intrinsic absorbers (i.e. gas close to the quasar nucleus, ejected by the quasar), as intrinsic absorbers are of higher metallicity, have higher ionisation parameter, and show complex absorption profiles. Secondly these two DLA absorbers cannot be equated with the gaseous disks of the quasar host galaxies, as the absorber redshifts differ significantly from the quasar systemic redshifts. It is likely, then, that intrinsically the z(abs) ~ z(em) DLA absorbers are the same as the intervening DLA absorbers, so that peculiarities in some of the z(abs) ~ z(em) absorbers can be ascribed to their different environment i.e. proximity to the quasar, or membership of the same cluster as the quasar. We point out that the proximity effect may play some role, by reducing the Ly-alpha forest line blanketing of any Ly-alpha emission line from z(abs) ~ z(em) absorbers.