Researcher profile

Stephanie Galaitsi

Stephanie Galaitsi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2)

To benefit from AI advances, users and operators of AI systems must have reason to trust it. Trust arises from multiple interactions, where predictable and desirable behavior is reinforced over time. Providing the system's users with some understanding of AI operations can support predictability, but forcing AI to explain itself risks constraining AI capabilities to only those reconcilable with human cognition. We argue that AI systems should be designed with features that build trust by bringing decision-analytic perspectives and formal tools into AI. Instead of trying to achieve explainable AI, we should develop interpretable and actionable AI. Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. In doing so, it will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making and ensure broad benefits from deploying and advancing its computational capabilities.

preprint2020arXiv

The Need to Reconcile Concepts that Characterize Systems Withstanding Threats

Desirable system performance in the face of threats and disruptions has been characterized by various management concepts. Through semi-structured interviews with editors of journals in the fields of emergency response and systems management, a literature review, and professional judgment, we identified nine related and often interchangeably-used system performance concepts: adaptability, agility, reliability, resilience, resistance, robustness, safety, security, and sustainability. We analysed expert responses and reviewed the linguistic definitions and mathematical framing of these concepts to understand their applications. We found a lack of consensus on their usage between interview subjects, but using a mathematical framing enriched the linguistic definitions and enabled formulating comparative visualizations and system-specific definitions for the concepts. We propose a conceptual framing to relate the concepts for management purposes. A better understanding of these concepts will allow system planners to pursue management strategies best suited to their unique system dynamics and specific objectives of 'goodness' that all these concepts bring.