BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stéphane Operto

Stéphane Operto contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCphysics.comp-pheess.SPmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Attenuation imaging by wavefield reconstruction inversion with bound constraints and total variation regularization

Wavefield reconstruction inversion (WRI) extends the search space of Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) by allowing for wave equation errors during wavefield reconstruction to match the data from the first iteration. Then, the wavespeeds are updated from the wavefields by minimizing the source residuals. Performing these two tasks in alternating mode breaks down the nonlinear FWI as a sequence of two linear subproblems, relaying on the bilinearity of the wave equation. We solve this biconvex optimization with the alternating-direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to cancel out efficiently the data and source residuals in iterations and stabilize the parameter estimation with appropriate regularizations. Here, we extend WRI to viscoacoustic media for attenuation imaging. Attenuation reconstruction is challenging because of the small imprint of attenuation in the data and the cross-talks with velocities. To address these issues, we recast the multivariate viscoacoustic WRI as a triconvex optimization and update wavefields, squared slowness, and attenuation factor in alternating mode at each WRI iteration. This requires to linearize the attenuation-estimation subproblem via an approximated trilinear viscoacoustic wave equation. The iterative defect correction embedded in ADMM corrects the errors generated by this linearization, while the operator splitting allows us to tailor $\ell{1}$ regularization to each parameter class. A toy numerical example shows that these strategies mitigate cross-talk artifacts and noise from the attenuation reconstruction. A more realistic synthetic example representative of the North Sea validates the method.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Full Waveform Inversion with Adaptive Regularization

Regularization is necessary for solving nonlinear ill-posed inverse problems arising in different fields of geosciences. The base of a suitable regularization is the prior expressed by the regularizer, which can be non-adaptive or adaptive (data-driven). In this paper, we propose general black-box regularization algorithms for solving nonlinear inverse problems such as full-waveform inversion (FWI), which admit empirical priors that are determined adaptively by sophisticated denoising algorithms. The nonlinear inverse problem is solved by a proximal Newton method, which generalizes the traditional Newton step in such a way to involve the gradients/subgradients of a (possibly non-differentiable) regularization function through operator splitting and proximal mappings. Furthermore, it requires to account for the Hessian matrix in the regularized least-squares optimization problem. We propose two different splitting algorithms for this task. In the first, we compute the Newton search direction with an iterative method based upon the first-order generalized iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm (ISTA), and hence Newton-ISTA (NISTA). The iterations require only Hessian-vector products to compute the gradient step of the quadratic approximation of the nonlinear objective function. The second relies on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM), and hence Newton-ADMM (NADMM), where the least-square optimization subproblem and the regularization subproblem in the composite are decoupled through auxiliary variable and solved in an alternating mode. We compare NISTA and NADMM numerically by solving full-waveform inversion with BM3D regularizations. The tests show promising results obtained by both algorithms. However, NADMM shows a faster convergence rate than Newton-ISTA when using L-BFGS to solve the Newton system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Iterative frequency-domain seismic wave solvers based on multi-level domain-decomposition preconditioners

Frequency-domain full-waveform inversion (FWI) is suitable for long-offset stationary-recording acquisition, since reliable subsurface models can be reconstructed with a few frequencies and attenuation is easily implemented without computational overhead. In the frequency domain, wave modelling is a Helmholtz-type boundary-value problem which requires to solve a large and sparse system of linear equations per frequency with multiple right-hand sides (sources). This system can be solved with direct or iterative methods. While the former are suitable for FWI application on 3D dense OBC acquisitions covering spatial domains of moderate size, the later should be the approach of choice for sparse node acquisitions covering large domains (more than 50 millions of unknowns). Fast convergence of iterative solvers for Helmholtz problems remains however challenging due to the non definiteness of the Helmholtz operator, hence requiring efficient preconditioners. In this study, we use the Krylov subspace GMRES iterative solver combined with a multi-level domain-decomposition preconditioner. Discretization relies on continuous finite elements on unstructured tetrahedral meshes to comply with complex geometries and adapt the size of the elements to the local wavelength ($h$-adaptivity). We assess the convergence and the scalability of our method with the acoustic 3D SEG/EAGE Overthrust model up to a frequency of 20~Hz and discuss its efficiency for multi right-hand side processing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Large-scale frequency-domain seismic wave modeling on {\it{h}}-adaptive tetrahedral meshes with iterative solver and multi-level domain-decomposition preconditioners

Frequency-domain full-waveform inversion (FWI) is suitable for long-offset stationary-recording acquisition, since reliable subsurface models can be reconstructed with a few frequencies and attenuation is easily implemented without computational overhead. In the frequency domain, wave modeling is a Helmholtz-type boundary-value problem which requires to solve a large and sparse system of linear equations per frequency with multiple right-hand sides (sources). This system can be solved with direct or iterative methods. While the former are suitable for FWI application on 3D dense OBC acquisitions covering spatial domains of moderate size, the later should be the approach of choice for sparse node acquisitions covering large domains (more than 50 millions of unknowns). Fast convergence of iterative solvers for Helmholtz problems remains however challenging in high frequency regime due to the non definiteness of the Helmholtz operator, on one side and on the discretization constraints in order to minimize the dispersion error for a given frequency, on the other side, hence requiring efficient preconditioners. In this study, we use the Krylov subspace GMRES iterative solver combined with a two-level domain-decomposition preconditioner. Discretization relies on continuous Lagrange finite elements of order 3 on unstructured tetrahedral meshes to comply with complex geometries and adapt the size of the elements to the local wavelength ($h$-adaptivity). We assess the accuracy, the convergence and the scalability of our method with the acoustic 3D SEG/EAGE Overthrust model up to a frequency of 20~Hz.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Robust Wavefield Inversion via Phase Retrieval

Extended formulation of Full Waveform Inversion (FWI), called Wavefield Reconstruction Inversion (WRI), offers potential benefits of decreasing the nonlinearity of the inverse problem by replacing the explicit inverse of the ill-conditioned wave-equation operator of classical FWI (the oscillating Green functions) with a suitably defined data-driven regularized inverse. This regularization relaxes the wave-equation constraint to reconstruct wavefields that match the data, hence mitigating the risk of cycle skipping. The subsurface model parameters are then updated in a direction that reduces these constraint violations. However, in the case of a rough initial model, the phase errors in the reconstructed wavefields may trap the waveform inversion in a local minimum leading to inaccurate subsurface models. In this paper, in order to avoid matching such incorrect phase information during the early WRI iterations, we design a new cost function based upon phase retrieval, namely a process which seeks to reconstruct a signal from the amplitude of linear measurements. This new formulation, called Wavefield Inversion with Phase Retrieval (WIPR), further improves the robustness of the parameter estimation subproblem by a suitable phase correction. We implement the resulting WIPR problem with an alternating-direction approach, which combines the Majorization-Minimization (MM) algorithm to linearise the phase-retrieval term and a variable splitting technique based upon the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM). This new workflow equipped with Tikhonov-total variation (TT) regularization, which is the combination of second-order Tikhonov and total variation regularizations and bound constraints, successfully reconstructs the 2004 BP salt model from a sparse fixed-spread acquisition using a 3~Hz starting frequency and a homogeneous initial velocity model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access