BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Stéphane Graham-Lengrand

Stéphane Graham-Lengrand appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Logic in Computer ScienceProgramming Languages

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Solving bitvectors with MCSAT: explanations from bits and pieces (long version)

We present a decision procedure for the theory of fixed-sized bitvectors in the MCSAT framework. MCSAT is an alternative to CDCL(T) for SMT solving and can be seen as an extension of CDCL to domains other than the Booleans. Our procedure uses BDDs to record and update the sets of feasible values of bitvector variables. For explaining conflicts and propagations, we develop specialized word-level interpolation for two common fragments of the theory. For full generality, explaining conflicts outside of the covered fragments resorts to local bitblasting. The approach is implemented in the Yices 2 SMT solver and we present experimental results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Axiomatic constraint systems for proof search modulo theories

Goal-directed proof search in first-order logic uses meta-variables to delay the choice of witnesses; substitutions for such variables are produced when closing proof-tree branches, using first-order unification or a theory-specific background reasoner. This paper investigates a generalisation of such mechanisms whereby theory-specific constraints are produced instead of substitutions. In order to design modular proof-search procedures over such mechanisms, we provide a sequent calculus with meta-variables, which manipulates such constraints abstractly. Proving soundness and completeness of the calculus leads to an axiomatisation that identifies the conditions under which abstract constraints can be generated and propagated in the same way unifiers usually are. We then extract from our abstract framework a component interface and a specification for concrete implementations of background reasoners.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Realisability semantics of abstract focussing, formalised

We present a sequent calculus for abstract focussing, equipped with proof-terms: in the tradition of Zeilberger's work, logical connectives and their introduction rules are left as a parameter of the system, which collapses the synchronous and asynchronous phases of focussing as macro rules. We go further by leaving as a parameter the operation that extends a context of hypotheses with new ones, which allows us to capture both classical and intuitionistic focussed sequent calculi. We then define the realisability semantics of (the proofs of) the system, on the basis of Munch-Maccagnoni's orthogonality models for the classical focussed sequent calculus, but now operating at the higher level of abstraction mentioned above. We prove, at that level, the Adequacy Lemma, namely that if a term is of type A, then in the model its denotation is in the (set-theoretic) interpretation of A. This exhibits the fact that the universal quantification involved when taking the orthogonal of a set, reflects in the semantics Zeilberger's universal quantification in the macro rule for the asynchronous phase. The system and its semantics are all formalised in Coq.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Polarities & Focussing: a journey from Realisability to Automated Reasoning

This dissertation explores the roles of polarities and focussing in various aspects of Computational Logic. These concepts play a key role in the the interpretation of proofs as programs, a.k.a. the Curry-Howard correspondence, in the context of classical logic. Arising from linear logic, they allow the construction of meaningful semantics for cut-elimination in classical logic, some of which relate to the Call-by-Name and Call-by-Value disciplines of functional programming. The first part of this dissertation provides an introduction to these interpretations, highlighting the roles of polarities and focussing. For instance: proofs of positive formulae provide structured data, while proofs of negative formulae consume such data; focussing allows the description of the interaction between the two kinds of proofs as pure pattern-matching. This idea is pushed further in the second part of this dissertation, and connected to realisability semantics, where the structured data is interpreted algebraically, and the consumption of such data is modelled with the use of an orthogonality relation. Most of this part has been proved in the Coq proof assistant. Polarities and focussing were also introduced with applications to logic programming in mind, where computation is proof-search. In the third part of this dissertation, we push this idea further by exploring the roles that these concepts can play in other applications of proof-search, such as theorem proving and more particularly automated reasoning. We use these concepts to describe the main algorithm of SAT-solvers and SMT-solvers: DPLL. We then describe the implementation of a proof-search engine called Psyche. Its architecture, based on the concept of focussing, offers a platform where smart techniques from automated reasoning (or a user interface) can safely and trustworthily be implemented via the use of an API.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A simple presentation of the effective topos

We propose for the Effective Topos an alternative construction: a realisability framework composed of two levels of abstraction. This construction simplifies the proof that the Effective Topos is a topos (equipped with natural numbers), which is the main issue that this paper addresses. In this our work can be compared to Frey's monadic tripos-to-topos construction. However, no topos theory or even category theory is here required for the construction of the framework itself, which provides a semantics for higher-order type theories, supporting extensional equalities and the axiom of unique choice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Proceedings Sixth Workshop on Intersection Types and Related Systems

This volume contains the proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Intersection Types and Related Systems (ITRS 2012). The workshop was held in Dubrovnik (Croatia) on June 29th, 2012, affiliated to Twenty-Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2012). The ITRS workshop aims to bring together researchers working on both the theory and practical applications of systems based on intersection types and related approaches (e.g., union types, refinement types, behavioural types, recursive types, and so on).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Sequent Calculi with procedure calls

In this paper, we introduce two focussed sequent calculi, LKp(T) and LK+(T), that are based on Miller-Liang's LKF system for polarised classical logic. The novelty is that those sequent calculi integrate the possibility to call a decision procedure for some background theory T, and the possibility to polarise literals "on the fly" during proof-search. These features are used in our other works to simulate the DPLL(T) procedure as proof-search in the extension of LKp(T) with a cut-rule. In this report we therefore prove cut-elimination in LKp(T). Contrary to what happens in the empty theory, the polarity of literals affects the provability of formulae in presence of a theory T. On the other hand, changing the polarities of connectives does not change the provability of formulae, only the shape of proofs. In order to prove this, we introduce a second sequent calculus, LK+(T) that extends LKp(T) with a relaxed focussing discipline, but we then show an encoding of LK+(T) back into the more restrictive system LK(T). We then prove completeness of LKp(T) (and therefore of LK+(T)) with respect to first-order reasoning modulo the ground propositional lemmas of the background theory T .

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access