Source author record

Stephan M. Kent

Stephan M. Kent appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2009arXiv

The Baryonic Acoustic Feature and Large-Scale Clustering in the SDSS LRG Sample

We examine the correlation function ξof the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Luminous Red Galaxy sample (LRG) at large scales (60<s<400 Mpc/h) using the final data release (DR7; 105,831 LRGs between 0.16<z<0.47). Using mock catalogs, we demonstrate that the observed baryonic acoustic peak and larger scale signal are consistent with LCDM at the 1.5σlevel. The signal at 155<s<200 Mpc/h tends to be high relative to theoretical expectations; this slight deviation can be attributed to a bright subsample of the LRGs. Fitting data to a non-linear, redshift-space, template based-model, we constrain the peak position at s_p=103.6+3.6-2.4 Mpc/h when fitting the range 60<s<150 Mpc/h (1σuncertainties measured from the mocks. This redshift-space distance s_p is related to the comoving sound horizon scale r_s after taking into account matter clustering non-linearities, redshift distortions and galaxy clustering bias. Mock catalogs show that the probability that a DR7-sized sample would not have an identifiable peak is at least 10%. As a consistency check of a fiducial cosmology, we use the observed s_p to obtain the distance D_V=[(1+z)^2D_A^2cz/H(z)]^(1/3) relative to the acoustic scale. We find r_s/D_V(z=0.278)=0.1394+-0.0049. This result is in excellent agreement with Percival et. al (2009), who examine roughly the same data set, but using the power spectrum. Comparison with other determinations in the literature are also in very good agreement. We have tested our results against a battery of possible systematic effects, finding all effects are smaller than our estimated sample variance.