BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stefan Weltge

Stefan Weltge contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.OCDiscrete MathematicsData Structures and Algorithmsmath.COComputational GeometryComputer Science and Game Theorymath.AGmath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Simple Method for Convex Optimization in the Oracle Model

We give a simple and natural method for computing approximately optimal solutions for minimizing a convex function $f$ over a convex set $K$ given by a separation oracle. Our method utilizes the Frank--Wolfe algorithm over the cone of valid inequalities of $K$ and subgradients of $f$. Under the assumption that $f$ is $L$-Lipschitz and that $K$ contains a ball of radius $r$ and is contained inside the origin centered ball of radius $R$, using $O(\frac{(RL)^2}{\varepsilon^2} \cdot \frac{R^2}{r^2})$ iterations and calls to the oracle, our main method outputs a point $x \in K$ satisfying $f(x) \leq \varepsilon + \min_{z \in K} f(z)$. Our algorithm is easy to implement, and we believe it can serve as a useful alternative to existing cutting plane methods. As evidence towards this, we show that it compares favorably in terms of iteration counts to the standard LP based cutting plane method and the analytic center cutting plane method, on a testbed of combinatorial, semidefinite and machine learning instances.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Lattice-free simplices with lattice width $2d - o(d)$

The Flatness theorem states that the maximum lattice width ${\rm Flt}(d)$ of a $d$-dimensional lattice-free convex set is finite. It is the key ingredient for Lenstra's algorithm for integer programming in fixed dimension, and much work has been done to obtain bounds on ${\rm Flt}(d)$. While most results have been concerned with upper bounds, only few techniques are known to obtain lower bounds. In fact, the previously best known lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 1.138d$ arises from direct sums of a $3$-dimensional lattice-free simplex. In this work, we establish the lower bound ${\rm Flt}(d) \ge 2d - O(\sqrt{d})$, attained by a family of lattice-free simplices. Our construction is based on a differential equation that naturally appears in this context. Additionally, we provide the first local maximizers of the lattice width of $4$- and $5$-dimensional lattice-free convex bodies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Pareto cover problem

We introduce the problem of finding a set $B$ of $k$ points in $[0,1]^n$ such that the expected cost of the cheapest point in $B$ that dominates a random point from $[0,1]^n$ is minimized. We study the case where the coordinates of the random points are independently distributed and the cost function is linear. This problem arises naturally in various application areas where customers' requests are satisfied based on predefined products, each corresponding to a subset of features. We show that the problem is NP-hard already for $k=2$ when each coordinate is drawn from $\{0,1\}$, and obtain an FPTAS for general fixed $k$ under mild assumptions on the distributions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Binary scalar products

Let $A,B \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d $ both span $\mathbb{R}^d$ such that $\langle a, b \rangle \in \{0,1\}$ holds for all $a \in A$, $b \in B$. We show that $ |A| \cdot |B| \le (d+1) 2^d $. This allows us to settle a conjecture by Bohn, Faenza, Fiorini, Fisikopoulos, Macchia, and Pashkovich (2015) concerning 2-level polytopes. Such polytopes have the property that for every facet-defining hyperplane $H$ there is a parallel hyperplane $H'$ such that $H \cup H'$ contain all vertices. The authors conjectured that for every $d$-dimensional 2-level polytope $P$ the product of the number of vertices of $P$ and the number of facets of $P$ is at most $d 2^{d+1}$, which we show to be true.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improved lower bound on the dimension of the EU council's voting rules

Kurz and Napel (2015) proved that the voting system of the EU council (based on the 2014 population data) cannot be represented as the intersection of six weighted games, i.e., its dimension is at least 7. This set a new record for real-world voting rules and the authors posed the exact determination as a challenge. Recently, Chen, Cheung, and Ng (2019) showed that the dimension is at most 24. We provide the first improved lower bound and show that the dimension is at least 8.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access