Researcher profile

Stefan Siegert

Stefan Siegert contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Spatial forecast postprocessing: The Max-and-Smooth approach

Numerical weather forecasts can exhibit systematic errors due to simplifying model assumptions and computational approximations. Statistical postprocessing is a statistical approach to correcting such biases. A statistical postprocessing model takes input data from a numerical forecast model, and outputs a parametric predictive distribution of a real-world observation, with model parameters learned from past forecast-observation pairs. In this paper we develop and discuss methods for postprocessing of gridded data. We show that estimates of postprocessing parameters on a spatial grid can be improved by Bayesian hierarchical modelling with spatial priors. We use the "Max-and-Smooth" approach [Hrafnkelsson et al., 2021] to approximate a fully Bayesian inference in two steps. First we calculate maximum-likelihood estimates (MLEs) of postprocessing parameters at individual grid points. Second we smooth the MLEs using a measurement error model with a spatial prior. Our approach provides the theoretical basis for the parameter smoothing approach by Kharin et al. [2017], and simplifies and generalises the Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach by Moeller et al. [2015]. A new derivation of Max-and-Smooth is presented. The method is applicable to arbitrary postprocessing models, as illustrated on Model Output Statistics, Logistic Regression, and Nonhomogeneous Gaussian Regression. We report consistent improvements in forecast accuracy, calibration, and probabilistic skill in postprocessing of temperature and precipitation forecasts.

preprint2020arXiv

Max-and-Smooth: a two-step approach for approximate Bayesian inference in latent Gaussian models

With modern high-dimensional data, complex statistical models are necessary, requiring computationally feasible inference schemes. We introduce Max-and-Smooth, an approximate Bayesian inference scheme for a flexible class of latent Gaussian models (LGMs) where one or more of the likelihood parameters are modeled by latent additive Gaussian processes. Max-and-Smooth consists of two-steps. In the first step (Max), the likelihood function is approximated by a Gaussian density with mean and covariance equal to either (a) the maximum likelihood estimate and the inverse observed information, respectively, or (b) the mean and covariance of the normalized likelihood function. In the second step (Smooth), the latent parameters and hyperparameters are inferred and smoothed with the approximated likelihood function. The proposed method ensures that the uncertainty from the first step is correctly propagated to the second step. Since the approximated likelihood function is Gaussian, the approximate posterior density of the latent parameters of the LGM (conditional on the hyperparameters) is also Gaussian, thus facilitating efficient posterior inference in high dimensions. Furthermore, the approximate marginal posterior distribution of the hyperparameters is tractable, and as a result, the hyperparameters can be sampled independently of the latent parameters. In the case of a large number of independent data replicates, sparse precision matrices, and high-dimensional latent vectors, the speedup is substantial in comparison to an MCMC scheme that infers the posterior density from the exact likelihood function. The proposed inference scheme is demonstrated on one spatially referenced real dataset and on simulated data mimicking spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal inference problems. Our results show that Max-and-Smooth is accurate and fast.