BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Stefan Hougardy

Stefan Hougardy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and Algorithmsmath.CODiscrete MathematicsComputational ComplexityComputational Geometry

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Fast Approximation Algorithms for Euclidean Minimum Weight Perfect Matching

We study the Euclidean minimum weight perfect matching problem for $n$ points in the plane. It is known that any deterministic approximation algorithm whose approximation ratio depends only on $n$ requires at least $Ω(n \log n)$ time. We propose such an algorithm for the Euclidean minimum weight perfect matching problem with runtime $O(n\log n)$ and show that it has approximation ratio $O(n^{0.206})$. This improves the so far best known approximation ratio of $n/2$. We also develop an $O(n \log n)$ algorithm for the Euclidean minimum weight perfect matching problem in higher dimensions and show it has approximation ratio $O(n^{0.412})$ in all fixed dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Fast Optimal Double Row Legalization Algorithm

In Placement Legalization, it is often assumed that (almost) all standard cells possess the same height and can therefore be aligned in cell rows, which can then be treated independently. However, this is no longer true for recent technologies, where a substantial number of cells of double- or even arbitrary multiple-row height is to be expected. Due to interdependencies between the cell placements within several rows, the legalization task becomes considerably harder. In this paper, we show how to optimize quadratic cell movement for pairs of adjacent rows comprising cells of single- as well as double-row height with a fixed left-to-right ordering in time $\mathcal{O}(n\cdot\log(n))$, whereby $n$ denotes the number of cells involved. Opposed to prior works, we thereby do not artificially bound the maximum cell movement and can guarantee to find an optimum solution. Experimental results show an average percental decrease of over $26\%$ in the total quadratic movement when compared to a legalization approach that fixes cells of more than single-row height after Global Placement.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Approximation Ratio of the 2-Opt Heuristic for the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem

The 2-Opt heuristic is a simple improvement heuristic for the Traveling Salesman Problem. It starts with an arbitrary tour and then repeatedly replaces two edges of the tour by two other edges, as long as this yields a shorter tour. We will prove that for Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problems with $n$ cities the approximation ratio of the 2-Opt heuristic is $Θ(\log n/ \log \log n)$. This improves the upper bound of $O(\log n$) given by Chandra, Karloff, and Tovey [3] in 1999.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Hard to Solve Instances of the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem

The well known $4/3$ conjecture states that the integrality ratio of the subtour LP is at most $4/3$ for metric Traveling Salesman instances. We present a family of Euclidean Traveling Salesman instances for which we prove that the integrality ratio of the subtour LP converges to $4/3$. These instances (using the rounded Euclidean norm) turn out to be hard to solve exactly with Concorde, the fastest existing exact TSP solver. For a 200 vertex instance from our family of Euclidean Traveling Salesman instances Concorde needs several days of CPU time. This is more than 1,000,000 times the runtime for a TSPLIB instance of similar size. Thus our new family of Euclidean Traveling Salesman instances may serve as new benchmark instances for TSP algorithms.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Approximation Ratio of the 2-Opt Heuristic for the Metric Traveling Salesman Problem

The 2-Opt heuristic is one of the simplest algorithms for finding good solutions to the metric Traveling Salesman Problem. It is the key ingredient to the well-known Lin-Kernighan algorithm and often used in practice. So far, only upper and lower bounds on the approximation ratio of the 2-Opt heuristic for the metric TSP were known. We prove that for the metric TSP with $n$ cities, the approximation ratio of the 2-Opt heuristic is $\sqrt{n/2}$ and that this bound is tight.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access