BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Soham R. Phade

Soham R. Phade contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computer Science and Game Theoryecon.TH

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Mechanism Design for Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Agents: A General Framework and the Revelation Principle

This paper initiates a discussion of mechanism design when the participating agents exhibit preferences that deviate from expected utility theory (EUT). In particular, we consider mechanism design for systems where the agents are modeled as having cumulative prospect theory (CPT) preferences, which is a generalization of EUT preferences. We point out some of the key modifications needed in the theory of mechanism design that arise from agents having CPT preferences and some of the shortcomings of the classical mechanism design framework. In particular, we show that the revelation principle, which has traditionally played a fundamental role in mechanism design, does not continue to hold under CPT. We develop an appropriate framework that we call mediated mechanism design which allows us to recover the revelation principle for CPT agents. We conclude with some interesting directions for future work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Black-Box Strategies and Equilibrium for Games with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Players

The betweenness property of preference relations states that a probability mixture of two lotteries should lie between them in preference. It is a weakened form of the independence property and hence satisfied in expected utility theory (EUT). Experimental violations of betweenness are well-documented and several preference theories, notably cumulative prospect theory (CPT), do not satisfy betweenness. We prove that CPT preferences satisfy betweenness if and only if they conform with EUT preferences. In game theory, lack of betweenness in the players' preference relations makes it essential to distinguish between the two interpretations of a mixed action by a player - conscious randomizations by the player and the uncertainty in the beliefs of the opponents. We elaborate on this distinction and study its implication for the definition of Nash equilibrium. This results in four different notions of equilibrium, with pure and mixed action Nash equilibrium being two of them. We dub the other two pure and mixed black-box strategy Nash equilibrium respectively. We resolve the issue of existence of such equilibria and examine how these different notions of equilibrium compare with each other.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Learning in Games with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Preferences

We consider repeated games where the players behave according to cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We show that, when the players have calibrated strategies and behave according to CPT, the natural analog of the notion of correlated equilibrium in the CPT case, as defined by Keskin, is not enough to capture all subsequential limits of the empirical distribution of action play. We define the notion of a mediated CPT correlated equilibrium via an extension of the stage game to a so-called mediated game. We then show, along the lines of the result of Foster and Vohra about convergence to the set of correlated equilibria when the players behave according to expected utility theory that, in the CPT case, under calibrated learning the empirical distribution of action play converges to the set of all mediated CPT correlated equilibria. We also show that, in general, the set of CPT correlated equilibria is not approachable in the Blackwell approachability sense. We observe that a mediated game is a specific type of a game with communication, as introduced by Myerson, and as a consequence we get that the revelation principle does not hold under CPT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access