BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Slavko Moconja

Slavko Moconja contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Invariant measures in simple and in small theories

We give examples of (i) a simple theory with a formula (with parameters) which does not fork over the empty set but has mu measure 0 for every automorphism invariant Keisler measure mu, and (ii) a definable group G in a simple theory such that G is not definably amenable, i.e. there is no translation invariant Keisler measure on G We also discuss paradoxical decompositions both in the setting of discrete groups and of definable groups, and prove some positive results about small theories, including the definable amenability of definable groups, and nontriviality of the graded Grothendieck ring.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Asymmetric regular types

We study asymmetric regular types. If $\frak p$ is regular and $A$-asymmetric then there exists a strict order such that Morley sequences in $\frak p$ over $A$ are strictly increasing (we allow Morley sequences to be indexed by elements of a linear order). We prove that for all $M\supseteq A$ maximal Morley sequences in $\frak p$ over $A$ consisting of elements of $M$ have the same (linear) order type, denoted by $\Inv_{\frak p,A}(M)$, which does not depend on the particular choice of the order witnessing the asymmetric regularity. In the countable case we determine all possibilities for $\Inv_{\frak p,A}(M)$: either it can be any countable linear order, or in any $M\supseteq A$ it is a dense linear order (provided that it has at least two elements). Then we study relationship between $\Inv_{\frak p,A}(M)$ and $\Inv_{\frak q,A}(M)$ when $\frak p$ and $\frak q$ are strongly regular, $A$-asymmetric, and such that $\frak p_{\strok A}$ and $\frak q_{\strok A}$ are not weakly orthogonal. We distinguish two kinds on non-orthogonality: bounded and unbounded. In the bounded case we prove that $\Inv_{\frak p,A}(M)$ and $\Inv_{\frak q,A}(M)$ are either isomorphic or anti-isomorphic. In the unbounded case, $\Inv_{\frak p,A}(M)$ and $\Inv_{\frak q,A}(M)$ may have distinct cardinalities but we prove that their Dedekind completions are either isomorphic or anti-isomorphic. We provide examples of all four situations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access