Source author record

Sina Jazani

Sina Jazani appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Automated Detection of Microaneurysms in Color Fundus Images using Deep Learning with Different Preprocessing Approaches

Imaging methods by using computer techniques provide doctors assistance at any time and relieve their workload, especially for iterative processes like identifying objects of interest such as lesions and anatomical structures from the image. Detection of microaneurysms (MAs) as one of the lesions in the retina is considered to be a crucial step in some retinal image analysis algorithms for the identification of diabetic retinopathy (DR) as the second-largest eye diseases in developed countries. The objective of this study is to compare the effect of two preprocessing methods, Illumination Equalization, and Top-hat transformation, on retinal images to detect MAs using a combination of Matching based approach and deep learning methods either in the normal fundus images or in the presence of DR. The steps for the detection are as following: 1) applying preprocessing, 2) vessel segmentation and masking, and 3) MAs detection using a combination of Matching based approach and deep learning. From the accuracy viewpoint, we compared the method to manual detection performed by ophthalmologists for our big retinal image databases (more than 2200 images). Using first preprocessing method, Illumination equalization and contrast enhancement, the accuracy of MAs detection was about 90% for all databases (one local and two publicly retinal databases). The performance of the MAs detection methods using top-hat preprocessing (the second preprocessing method) was more than 80% for all databases.