BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Simon Müller

Simon Müller appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
astro-ph.EPmath.LOmath.RA

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

On the Tree Structure of Orderings and Valuations on Rings

Let $R$ be a not necessarily commutative ring with $1.$ In the present paper we first introduce a notion of quasi-orderings, which axiomatically subsumes all the orderings and valuations on $R$. We proceed by uniformly defining a coarsening relation $\leq$ on the set $\mathcal{Q}(R)$ of all quasi-orderings on $R.$ One of our main results states that $(\mathcal{Q}(R),\leq')$ is a rooted tree for some slight modification $\leq'$ of $\leq,$ i.e. a partially ordered set admitting a maximum such that for any element there is a unique chain to that maximum. As an application of this theorem we obtain that $(\mathcal{Q}(R),\leq')$ is a spectral set, i.e. order-isomorphic to the spectrum of some commutative ring with $1.$ We conclude this paper by studying $\mathcal{Q}(R)$ as a topological space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Challenge of Forming a Fuzzy Core in Jupiter

Recent structure models of Jupiter that match Juno gravity data suggest that the planet harbours an extended region in its deep interior that is enriched in heavy elements, a so-called dilute/fuzzy core. This finding raises the question of what possible formation pathways would lead to such a structure. We model Jupiter's formation and long-term evolution, starting at late-stage formation before runaway gas accretion. The formation scenarios we consider include both primordial composition gradients, as well as gradients that are built as proto-Jupiter rapidly acquires its gaseous envelope. We then follow Jupiter's evolution as it cools down and contracts, with a particular focus on the energy and material transport in the interior. We find that none of the scenarios we consider lead to a fuzzy core that is compatible with interior structure models. In all the cases, most of Jupiter's envelope becomes convective and fully mixed after at most a few million years. This is true even when we consider a case where the gas accretion leads to a cold planet, and large amounts of heavy elements are accreted. It is therefore concluded that it is very challenging to explain Jupiter's dilute core from standard formation models. We suggest that future work should consider more complex formation pathways as well as the modelling of additional physical processes that could lead to Jupiter's current-state internal structure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Formation of Jupiter's Diluted Core by a Giant Impact

The Juno mission has provided an accurate determination of Jupiter's gravitational field, which has been used to obtain information about the planet's composition and internal structure. Several models of Jupiter's structure that fit the probe's data suggest that the planet has a diluted core, with a total heavy-element mass ranging from ten to a few tens of Earth masses (~5-15 % of the Jovian mass), and that heavy elements (elements other than H and He) are distributed within a region extending to nearly half of Jupiter's radius. Planet-formation models indicate that most heavy elements are accreted during the early stages of a planet's formation to create a relatively compact core and that almost no solids are accreted during subsequent runaway gas accretion. Jupiter's diluted core, combined with its possible high heavy-element enrichment, thus challenges standard planet-formation theory. A possible explanation is erosion of the initially compact heavy-element core, but the efficiency of such erosion is uncertain and depends on both the immiscibility of heavy materials in metallic hydrogen and on convective mixing as the planet evolves. Another mechanism that can explain this structure is planetesimal enrichment and vaporization during the formation process, although relevant models typically cannot produce an extended diluted core. Here we show that a sufficiently energetic head-on collision (giant impact) between a large planetary embryo and the proto-Jupiter could have shattered its primordial compact core and mixed the heavy elements with the inner envelope. Models of such a scenario lead to an internal structure that is consistent with a diluted core, persisting over billions of years. We suggest that collisions were common in the young Solar system and that a similar event may have also occurred for Saturn, contributing to the structural differences between Jupiter and Saturn.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access