Source author record

Simon Jäger

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Exponential Independence

For a set SS of vertices of a graph GG, a vertex uu in V(G)∖SV(G)\setminus S, and a vertex vv in SS, let dist(G,S)(u,v){\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v) be the distance of uu and vv in the graph G−(S∖{v})G-(S\setminus \{ v\}). Dankelmann et al. (Domination with exponential decay, Discrete Math. 309 (2009) 5877-5883) define SS to be an exponential dominating set of GG if w(G,S)(u)≥1w_{(G,S)}(u)\geq 1 for every vertex uu in V(G)∖SV(G)\setminus S, where w(G,S)(u)=∑v∈S(12)dist(G,S)(u,v)−1w_{(G,S)}(u)=\sum\limits_{v\in S}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{{\rm dist}_{(G,S)}(u,v)-1}. Inspired by this notion, we define SS to be an exponential independent set of GG if w(G,S∖{u})(u)<1w_{(G,S\setminus \{ u\})}(u)<1 for every vertex uu in SS, and the exponential independence number αe(G)α_e(G) of GG as the maximum order of an exponential independent set of GG. Similarly as for exponential domination, the non-local nature of exponential independence leads to many interesting effects and challenges. Our results comprise exact values for special graphs as well as tight bounds and the corresponding extremal graphs. Furthermore, we characterize all graphs GG for which αe(H)α_e(H) equals the independence number α(H)α(H) for every induced subgraph HH of GG, and we give an explicit characterization of all trees TT with αe(T)=α(T)α_e(T)=α(T).

preprint2016arXiv

Large Values of the Clustering Coefficient

A prominent parameter in the context of network analysis, originally proposed by Watts and Strogatz (Collective dynamics of `small-world' networks, Nature 393 (1998) 440-442), is the clustering coefficient of a graph GG. It is defined as the arithmetic mean of the clustering coefficients of its vertices, where the clustering coefficient of a vertex uu of GG is the relative density m(G[NG(u)])/(dG(u)2)m(G[N_G(u)])/{d_G(u)\choose 2} of its neighborhood if dG(u)d_G(u) is at least 22, and 00 otherwise. It is unknown which graphs maximize the clustering coefficient among all connected graphs of given order and size. We determine the maximum clustering coefficients among all connected regular graphs of a given order, as well as among all connected subcubic graphs of a given order. In both cases, we characterize all extremal graphs. Furthermore, we determine the maximum increase of the clustering coefficient caused by adding a single edge.

preprint2016arXiv

Relating Domination, Exponential Domination, and Porous Exponential Domination

The domination number γ(G)γ(G) of a graph GG, its exponential domination number γe(G)γ_e(G), and its porous exponential domination number γe∗(G)γ_e^*(G) satisfy γe∗(G)≤γe(G)≤γ(G)γ_e^*(G)\leq γ_e(G)\leq γ(G). We contribute results about the gaps in these inequalities as well as the graphs for which some of the inequalities hold with equality. Relaxing the natural integer linear program whose optimum value is γe∗(G)γ_e^*(G), we are led to the definition of the fractional porous exponential domination number γe,f∗(G)γ_{e,f}^*(G) of a graph GG. For a subcubic tree TT of order nn, we show γe,f∗(T)=n+26γ_{e,f}^*(T)=\frac{n+2}{6} and γe(T)≤2γe,f∗(T)γ_e(T)\leq 2γ_{e,f}^*(T). We characterize the two classes of subcubic trees TT with γe(T)=γe,f∗(T)γ_e(T)=γ_{e,f}^*(T) and γ(T)=γe(T)γ(T)=γ_e(T), respectively. Using linear programming arguments, we establish several lower bounds on the fractional porous exponential domination number in more general settings.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.