BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Siddharth Iyer

Siddharth Iyer contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Wave-encoding and Shuffling Enables Rapid Time Resolved Structural Imaging

T2-Shuffling reconstructs multiple sharp T2-weighted images from a single volumetric fast spin-echo (3D-FSE) scan. Wave-CAIPI is a parallel imaging technique that achieves good reconstruction at high accelerations through additional sinusoidal gradients that induce a voxel spreading effect in the readout direction to better take advantage of coil-sensitivity information. In this work, the Shuffling model in T2-Shuffling is augmented with wave-encoding to achieve higher acceleration capability. The resulting "Wave-Shuffling" approach is applied to 3D-FSE and Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo (MPRAGE) to achieve rapid, 1 mm-isotropic resolution, time-resolved structural imaging.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

SURE-based Automatic Parameter Selection For ESPIRiT Calibration

Purpose: Parallel imaging methods in MRI have resulted in faster acquisition times and improved noise performance. ESPIRiT is one such technique that estimates coil sensitivity maps from the auto-calibration region using an eigenvalue-based method. This method requires choosing several parameters for the the map estimation. Even though ESPIRiT is fairly robust to these parameter choices, occasionally, poor selection can result in reduced performance. The purpose of this work is to automatically select parameters in ESPIRiT for more robust and consistent performance across a variety of exams. Theory and Methods: Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE) is a method of calculating an unbiased estimate of the mean squared error of an estimator under certain assumptions. We show that this can be used to estimate the performance of ESPIRiT. We derive and demonstrate the use of SURE to optimize ESPIRiT parameter selection. Results: Simulations show SURE to be an accurate estimator of the mean squared error. SURE is then used to optimize ESPIRiT parameters to yield maps that are optimal in a denoising/data-consistency sense. This improves g-factor performance without causing undesirable attenuation. In-vivo experiments verify the reliability of this method. Conclusion: Simulation experiments demonstrate that SURE is an accurate estimate of expected mean squared error. Using SURE to determine ESPIRiT parameters allows for automatic parameter selections.In-vivo results are consistent with simulation and theoretical results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access