BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Shuanhong Wang

Shuanhong Wang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.RAmath.QAmath.OAComputational Complexitymath.ACmath.AGmath.RT

Catalog footprint

What is connected

16works
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

16 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Double crossed biproducts and related structures

Let $H$ be a bialgebra. Let $σ: H\otimes H\to A$ be a linear map, where $A$ is a left $H$-comodule coalgebra, and an algebra with a left $H$-weak action $\triangleright$. Let $τ: H\otimes H\to B$ be a linear map, where $B$ is a right $H$-comodule coalgebra, and an algebra with a right $H$-weak action $\triangleleft$. In this paper, we improve the necessary conditions for the two-sided crossed product algebra $A\#^σ H~{^τ\#} B$ and the two-sided smash coproduct coalgebra $A\times H\times B$ to form a bialgebra (called double crossed biproduct) such that the condition $b_{[1]}\triangleright a_0\otimes b_{[0]}\triangleleft a_{-1}=a\otimes b$ in Majid's double biproduct (or double-bosonization) is one of the necessary conditions. On the other hand, we provide a more general two-sided crossed product algebra structure via Brzezński's crossed product and give some applications.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Drinfel'd codouble constuction for monoidal Hom-Hopf algebra

Let $(H, β)$ be a monoidal Hom-Hopf algebra with the bijective antipode $S$, In this paper, we mainly construct the Drinfel'd codouble $T(H)=(H^{op}\otimes H^{*}, β\otimes β^{*-1})$ and $\widehat{T(H)}=( H^{*}\otimes H^{op}, β^{*-1}\otimes β)$ in the setting of monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. Then we prove both $T(H)$ and $\widehat{T(H)}$ are coquasitriangular. Finally, we discuss the relation between Drinfel'd codouble and Heisenberg double in the setting of monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras, which is a generalization of the part results in \cite{L94}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Constructing New Braided $T$-Categories via Weak Monoidal Hom-Hopf Algebras

In this paper, we define and study weak monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras, which generalize both weak Hopf algebras and monoidal Hom-Hopf algebras. If $H$ is a weak monoidal Hom-Hopf algebra with bijective antipode and let $Aut_{wmHH}(H)$ be the set of all automorphisms of $H$. Then we introduce a category ${_{H}\mathcal{WMHYD}^{H}}(α,β)$ with $α,β\in Aut_{wmHH}(H)$ and construct a braided $T$-category $\mathcal{WMHYD}(H)$ that having all the categories ${_{H}\mathcal{WMHYD}^{H}}(α,β)$ as components.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

The Drinfel'd Double versus the Heisenberg Double for Hom-Hopf Algebras

Let $(A,α)$ be a finite-dimensional Hom-Hopf algebra. In this paper we mainly construct the Drinfel'd double $D(A)=(A^{op}\bowtie A^{\ast},α\otimes(α^{-1})^{\ast})$ in the setting of Hom-Hopf algebras by two ways, one of which generalizes Majid's bicrossproduct for Hopf algebras (see \cite{M2}) and another one is to introduce the notion of dual pairs of of Hom-Hopf algebras. Then we study the relation between the Drinfel'd double $D(A)$ and Heisenberg double $H(A)=A\# A^{*}$, generalizing the main result in \cite{Lu}. Especially, the examples given in the paper are not obtained from the usual Hopf algebras.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Weak Multiplier Hopf Algebras II. The source and target algebras

In this paper, we continue the study of weak multiplier Hopf algebras. We recall the notions of the source and target maps $\varepsilon_s$ and $\varepsilon_t$, as well as of the source and target algebras. Then we investigate these objects further. Among other things, we show that the canonical idempotent $E$ (which is eventually $Δ(1)$) belongs to the multiplier algebra $M(B\otimes C)$ where $B=\varepsilon_s(A)$ and $C=\varepsilon_t(A)$ and that it is a separability idempotent. We also consider special cases and examples in this paper. In particular, we see how for any weak multiplier Hopf algebra, it is possible to make $C\otimes B$ (with $B$ and $C$ as above) into a new weak multiplier Hopf algebra. In a sense, it forgets the 'Hopf algebra part' of the original weak multiplier Hopf algebra and only remembers the source and target algebras. It is in turn generalized to the case of any pair of non-degenerate algebras $B$ and $C$ with a separability idempotent $E\in M(B\otimes C)$. We get another example using this theory associated to any discrete quantum group (a multiplier Hopf algebra of discrete type with a normalized cointegral). Finally we also consider the well-known 'quantization' of the groupoid that comes from an action of a group on a set. All these constructions provide interesting new examples of weak multiplier Hopf algebras (that are not weak Hopf algebras).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

A Note on Braided $T$-categories over Monoidal Hom-Hopf Algebras

Let $ Aut_{mHH}(H)$ denote the set of all automorphisms of a monoidal Hopf algebra $H$ with bijective antipode in the sense of Caenepeel and Goyvaerts \cite{CG2011}. The main aim of this paper is to provide new examples of braided $T$-category in the sense of Turaev \cite{T2008}. For this, first we construct a monoidal Hom-Hopf $T$-coalgebra $\mathcal{MHD}(H)$ and prove that the $T$-category $Rep(\mathcal{MHD}(H))$ of representation of $\mathcal{MHD}(H)$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal {MHYD}(H)$ as braided $T$-categories, if $H$ is finite-dimensional. Then we construct a new braided $T$-category $\mathcal{ZMHYD}(H)$ over $\mathbb{Z},$ generalizing the main construction by Staic \cite{S2007}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Constructing New Braided $T$-categories over Monoidal Hom-Hopf Algebras

Let $ Aut_{mHH}(H)$ denote a set of all automorphisms of a monoidal Hopf algebra $H$ with bijective antipode in the sense of Caenepeel S. and Goyvaerts I. (Commun. Algebra 39, 2216-2240, 2011) and let $G$ be a crossed product group $ Aut_{mHH}(H)\times Aut_{mHH}(H)$. The main aim of this paper is to provide further examples of braided $T$-category in the sense of Turaev (1994, 2008). For this purpose, we first introduce a class of new categories $_{H}\mathcal {MHYD}^{H}(A, B)$ of monoidal Hom $(A, B)$-Yetter-Drinfeld modules with $A, B \in Aut_{mHH}(H)$. Then we show that the category ${\cal MHYD}(H)=\{{}_{H}\mathcal {MHYD}^{H}(A, B)\}_{(A, B)\in G}$ forms a braided $T$-category, generalizing the main constructions construction by Panaite and Staic (Isr J Math 158:349-365, 2007).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Bicrossproducts of algebraic quantum groups

Let $A$ and $B$ be two algebraic quantum groups (i.e. multiplier Hopf algebras with integrals). Assume that $B$ is a right $A$-module algebra and that $A$ is a left $B$-comodule coalgebra. If the action and coaction are matched, it is possible to define a coproduct $Δ_#$ on the smash product $A # B$ making the pair $(A # B,Δ_#)$ into an algebraic quantum group. In this paper, we continue the study of these objects. First, we study the various data of the bicrossproduct $A # B$, such as the modular automorphisms, the modular elements, ... and obtain formulas in terms of the data of the components $A$ and $B$. Secondly, we look at the dual of $A # B$ (in the sense of algebraic quantum groups) and we show it is itself a bicrossproduct (of the second type) of the duals $\hatA$ and $\hatB$. The result is immediate for finite-dimensional Hopf algebras and therefore it is expected also for algebraic quantum groups. However, it turns out that some aspects involve a careful argument, mainly due to the fact that coproducts and coactions have ranges in the multiplier algebras of the tensor products and not in the tensor product itself. Finally, we also treat some examples in this paper. We have included some of the examples that are known for finite-dimensional Hopf algebras and show how they can also be obtained for more general algebraic quantum groups. We also give some examples that are more typical for algebraic quantum groups. In particular, we focus on the extra structure, provided by the integrals and associated objects. It should be mentioned that with examples of bicrossproducts of algebraic quantum groups, we do get examples that are essentially different from those commonly known in Hopf algebra theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Weak Multiplier Hopf Algebras. Preliminaries, motivation and basic examples

Let $G$ be a {\it finite group}. Consider the algebra $A$ of all complex functions on G (with pointwise product). Define a coproduct $Δ$ on A by $Δ(f)(p,q)=f(pq)$ where $f\in A$ and $p,q\in G$. Then $(A,Δ)$ is a Hopf algebra. If $G$ is only a {\it groupoid}, so that the product of two elements is not always defined, one still can consider $A$ and define $Δ(f)(p,q)$ as above when $pq$ is defined. If we let $Δ(f)(p,q)=0$ otherwise, we still get a coproduct on $A$, but $Δ(1)$ will no longer be the identity in $A\ot A$. The pair $(A,Δ)$ is not a Hopf algebra but a weak Hopf algebra. If $G$ is a {\it group}, but {\it no longer finite}, one takes for $A$ the algebra of functions with finite support. Then $A$ has no identity and $(A,Δ)$ is not a Hopf algebra but a multiplier Hopf algebra. Finally, if $G$ is a {\it groupoid}, but {\it not necessarily finite}, the standard construction above, will give, what we call in this paper, a weak multiplier Hopf algebra. Indeed, this paper is devoted to the development of this 'missing link': {\it weak multiplier Hopf algebras}. We spend a great part of this paper to the motivation of our notion and to explain where the various assumptions come from. The goal is to obtain a good definition of a weak multiplier Hopf algebra. Throughout the paper, we consider the basic examples and use them, as far as this is possible, to illustrate what we do. In particular, we think of the finite-dimensional weak Hopf algebras. On the other hand however, we are also inspired by the far more complicated existing analytical theory. In forthcoming papers on the subject, we develop the theory further.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Weak Multiplier Hopf Algebras. The main theory

A weak multiplier Hopf algebra is a pair (A,Δ) of a non-degenerate idempotent algebra A and a coproduct $Δ$ on A. The coproduct is a coassociative homomorphism from A to the multiplier algebra M(A\otimes A) with some natural extra properties (like the existence of a counit). Further we impose extra but natural conditions on the ranges and the kernels of the canonical maps T_1 and T_2 defined from A\otimes A to M(A\otimes A) by T_1(a\otimes b)=Δ(a)(1\otimes b) and T_2(a\ot b)=(a\otimes 1)Δ(b). The first condition is about the ranges of these maps. It is assumed that there exists an idempotent element E\in M(A\otimes A) such that Δ(A)(1\ot A)=E(A\ot A) and (A\otimes 1)Δ(A)=(A\otimes A)E. The second condition determines the behavior of the coproduct on the legs of E. We require (Δ\otimes ι)(E)=(ι\otimesΔ)(E)=(1\otimes E)(E\ot 1)=(E\otimes 1)(1\otimes E) where $ι$ is the identity map and where $Δ\otimes ι$ and $ι\otimesΔ$ are extensions to the multipier algebra M(A\otimes A). Finally, the last condition determines the kernels of the canonical maps T_1 and T_2 in terms of this idempotent E by a very specific relation. From these conditions we develop the theory. In particular, we construct a unique antipode satisfying the expected properties and various other data. Special attention is given to the regular case (that is when the antipode is bijective) and the case of a *-algebra (where regularity is automatic). Weak Hopf algebras are special cases of such weak multiplier Hopf algebras. Conversely, if the underlying algebra of a (regular) weak multiplier Hopf algebra has an identity, it is a weak Hopf algebra. Also any groupoid, finite or not, yields two weak multiplier Hopf algebras in duality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2006arXiv

A note on Radford's $S^4$ formula

In this note, we show that Radford's formula for the fourth power of the antipode can be proven for any regular multiplier Hopf algebra with integrals (algebraic quantum groups). This of course not only includes the case of a finite-dimensional Hopf algebra but also the case of any Hopf algebra with integrals (co-Frobenius Hopf algebras). The proof follows in a few lines from well-known formulas in the theory of regular multiplier Hopf algebras with integrals. We discuss these formulas and their importance in this theory. We also mention their generalizations to the (in a certain sense) more general theory of locally compact quantum groups. Doing so, and also because the proof of the main result itself is very short, the present note becomes largely of an expository nature.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access