Source author record

Shuailong Liang

Shuailong Liang appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Attention Guided Dialogue State Tracking with Sparse Supervision

Existing approaches to Dialogue State Tracking (DST) rely on turn level dialogue state annotations, which are expensive to acquire in large scale. In call centers, for tasks like managing bookings or subscriptions, the user goal can be associated with actions (e.g.~API calls) issued by customer service agents. These action logs are available in large volumes and can be utilized for learning dialogue states. However, unlike turn-level annotations, such logged actions are only available sparsely across the dialogue, providing only a form of weak supervision for DST models. To efficiently learn DST with sparse labels, we extend a state-of-the-art encoder-decoder model. The model learns a slot-aware representation of dialogue history, which focuses on relevant turns to guide the decoder. We present results on two public multi-domain DST datasets (MultiWOZ and Schema Guided Dialogue) in both settings i.e. training with turn-level and with sparse supervision. The proposed approach improves over baseline in both settings. More importantly, our model trained with sparse supervision is competitive in performance to fully supervised baselines, while being more data and cost efficient.

preprint2020arXiv

Does It Make Sense? And Why? A Pilot Study for Sense Making and Explanation

Introducing common sense to natural language understanding systems has received increasing research attention. It remains a fundamental question on how to evaluate whether a system has a sense making capability. Existing benchmarks measures commonsense knowledge indirectly and without explanation. In this paper, we release a benchmark to directly test whether a system can differentiate natural language statements that make sense from those that do not make sense. In addition, a system is asked to identify the most crucial reason why a statement does not make sense. We evaluate models trained over large-scale language modeling tasks as well as human performance, showing that there are different challenges for system sense making.

preprint2020arXiv

SemEval-2020 Task 4: Commonsense Validation and Explanation

In this paper, we present SemEval-2020 Task 4, Commonsense Validation and Explanation (ComVE), which includes three subtasks, aiming to evaluate whether a system can distinguish a natural language statement that makes sense to humans from one that does not, and provide the reasons. Specifically, in our first subtask, the participating systems are required to choose from two natural language statements of similar wording the one that makes sense and the one does not. The second subtask additionally asks a system to select the key reason from three options why a given statement does not make sense. In the third subtask, a participating system needs to generate the reason. We finally attracted 39 teams participating at least one of the three subtasks. For Subtask A and Subtask B, the performances of top-ranked systems are close to that of humans. However, for Subtask C, there is still a relatively large gap between systems and human performance. The dataset used in our task can be found at https://github.com/wangcunxiang/SemEval2020- Task4-Commonsense-Validation-and-Explanation; The leaderboard can be found at https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/21080#results.