Source author record

Shota Tanaka

Shota Tanaka appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Effect of skin-to-skin contact on stimulation threshold and dosimetry

The human dosimetry for electromagnetic field exposure is an essential task to develop exposure guidelines/standards for human safety as well as product safety assessment. At frequencies from a few hundred Hz to 10 MHz, the adverse effect to be protected is the stimulation of the peripheral nervous system. The in situ electric field in the skin is used as a surrogate of nerve activation. In the low-frequency dosimetry, a high but inaccurate in situ electric field has been reported at positions where a skin-to-skin contact exists, whose relation to the stimulation is controversial. One of the reasons for high electric fields may be attributable to the current resolution of anatomical models. In this study, we first evaluate the stimulation threshold at postures of skin-to-skin contact experimentally for different hand/finger positions to represent skin touching/non-touching scenarios. We confirm that the skin-to-skin contact does not lower the threshold current of magnetic stimulation devices needed to induce pain. Second, a new method is proposed for hand modeling to configure different finger positions using static hand models with similar postures to the experiments. We compute the in situ electric field at skin-to-skin contact for the different hand posture scenarios that indicate an excessive raise of the electric field in skin-to-skin regions that is not justified by the experiments. The comparison suggests that a high in situ electric field in the skin would be caused by poor modeling of the skin layers, which is not enough to represent in a resolution of the order of a millimeter. This skin-to-skin contact should not be considered to set the restriction in the international exposure guidelines/standards as well as product safety assessment.