BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shiyu Chen

Shiyu Chen contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
DatabasesInformation Retrievalmath.OC

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Google Dataset Search by the Numbers

Scientists, governments, and companies increasingly publish datasets on the Web. Google's Dataset Search extracts dataset metadata -- expressed using schema.org and similar vocabularies -- from Web pages in order to make datasets discoverable. Since we started the work on Dataset Search in 2016, the number of datasets described in schema.org has grown from about 500K to almost 30M. Thus, this corpus has become a valuable snapshot of data on the Web. To the best of our knowledge, this corpus is the largest and most diverse of its kind. We analyze this corpus and discuss where the datasets originate from, what topics they cover, which form they take, and what people searching for datasets are interested in. Based on this analysis, we identify gaps and possible future work to help make data more discoverable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Deep Networks as Approximators of Optimal Transfers Solutions in Multitarget Missions

In the design of multitarget interplanetary missions, there are always many options available, making it often impractical to optimize in detail each transfer trajectory in a preliminary search phase. Fast and accurate estimation methods for optimal transfers are thus of great value. In this paper, deep feed-forward neural networks are employed to estimate solutions to three types of optimization problems: the transfer time of time-optimal low-thrust transfers, fuel consumption of fuel-optimal low-thrust transfers, and the total dv of minimum-dv J2-perturbed multi-impulse transfers. To generate the training data, low-thrust trajectories are optimized using the indirect method and J2-perturbed multi-impulse trajectories are optimized using J2 homotopy and particle swarm optimization. The hyper-parameters of our deep networks are searched by grid search, random search, and the tree-structured Parzen estimators approach. Results show that deep networks are capable of estimating the final mass or time of optimal transfers with extremely high accuracy; resulting into a mean relative error of less than 0.5% for low-thrust transfers and less than 4% for multi-impulse transfers. Our results are also compared with other off-the-shelf machine-learning algorithms and investigated with respect to their capability of predicting cases well outside of the training data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access