BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Shiwen Ni

Shiwen Ni contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computation and LanguageComputer VisionSocial and Information Networks

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Expanding before Inferring: Enhancing Factuality in Large Language Models through Premature Layers Interpolation

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in text understanding and generation. However, their tendency to produce factually inconsistent outputs, commonly referred to as ''hallucinations'', remains a critical challenge. Existing approaches, such as retrieval-based and inference-time correction methods, primarily address this issue at the input or output level, often overlooking the intrinsic information refinement process and the role of premature layers. Meanwhile, alignment- and fine-tuning-based methods are resource-intensive. In this paper, we propose PLI (Premature Layers Interpolation), a novel, training-free, and plug-and-play intervention designed to enhance factuality. PLI mitigates hallucinations by inserting premature layers formed through mathematical interpolation with adjacent layers. Inspired by stable diffusion and sampling steps, PLI extends the depth of information processing and transmission in LLMs, improving factual coherence. Experiments on four publicly available datasets demonstrate that PLI effectively reduces hallucinations while outperforming existing baselines in most cases. Further analysis suggests that the success of layer interpolation is closely linked to LLMs' internal mechanisms. Our dataset and code are available at https://github.com/CuSO4-Chen/PLI.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Visual Merit or Linguistic Crutch? A Close Look at DeepSeek-OCR

DeepSeek-OCR utilizes an optical 2D mapping approach to achieve high-ratio vision-text compression, claiming to decode text tokens exceeding ten times the input visual tokens. While this suggests a promising solution for the LLM long-context bottleneck, we investigate a critical question: "Visual merit or linguistic crutch - which drives DeepSeek-OCR's performance?" By employing sentence-level and word-level semantic corruption, we isolate the model's intrinsic OCR capabilities from its language priors. Results demonstrate that without linguistic support, DeepSeek-OCR's performance plummets from approximately 90% to 20%. Comparative benchmarking against 13 baseline models reveals that traditional pipeline OCR methods exhibit significantly higher robustness to such semantic perturbations than end-to-end methods. Furthermore, we find that lower visual token counts correlate with increased reliance on priors, exacerbating hallucination risks. Context stress testing also reveals a total model collapse around 10,000 text tokens, suggesting that current optical compression techniques may paradoxically aggravate the long-context bottleneck. This study empirically defines DeepSeek-OCR's capability boundaries and offers essential insights for future optimizations of the vision-text compression paradigm. We release all data, results and scripts used in this study at https://github.com/dududuck00/DeepSeekOCR.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

ELECTRA is a Zero-Shot Learner, Too

Recently, for few-shot or even zero-shot learning, the new paradigm "pre-train, prompt, and predict" has achieved remarkable achievements compared with the "pre-train, fine-tune" paradigm. After the success of prompt-based GPT-3, a series of masked language model (MLM)-based (e.g., BERT, RoBERTa) prompt learning methods became popular and widely used. However, another efficient pre-trained discriminative model, ELECTRA, has probably been neglected. In this paper, we attempt to accomplish several NLP tasks in the zero-shot scenario using a novel our proposed replaced token detection (RTD)-based prompt learning method. Experimental results show that ELECTRA model based on RTD-prompt learning achieves surprisingly state-of-the-art zero-shot performance. Numerically, compared to MLM-RoBERTa-large and MLM-BERT-large, our RTD-ELECTRA-large has an average of about 8.4% and 13.7% improvement on all 15 tasks. Especially on the SST-2 task, our RTD-ELECTRA-large achieves an astonishing 90.1% accuracy without any training data. Overall, compared to the pre-trained masked language models, the pre-trained replaced token detection model performs better in zero-shot learning. The source code is available at: https://github.com/nishiwen1214/RTD-ELECTRA.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

HAT4RD: Hierarchical Adversarial Training for Rumor Detection on Social Media

With the development of social media, social communication has changed. While this facilitates people's communication and access to information, it also provides an ideal platform for spreading rumors. In normal or critical situations, rumors will affect people's judgment and even endanger social security. However, natural language is high-dimensional and sparse, and the same rumor may be expressed in hundreds of ways on social media. As such, the robustness and generalization of the current rumor detection model are put into question. We proposed a novel \textbf{h}ierarchical \textbf{a}dversarial \textbf{t}raining method for \textbf{r}umor \textbf{d}etection (HAT4RD) on social media. Specifically, HAT4RD is based on gradient ascent by adding adversarial perturbations to the embedding layers of post-level and event-level modules to deceive the detector. At the same time, the detector uses stochastic gradient descent to minimize the adversarial risk to learn a more robust model. In this way, the post-level and event-level sample spaces are enhanced, and we have verified the robustness of our model under a variety of adversarial attacks. Moreover, visual experiments indicate that the proposed model drifts into an area with a flat loss landscape, leading to better generalization. We evaluate our proposed method on three public rumors datasets from two commonly used social platforms (Twitter and Weibo). Experiment results demonstrate that our model achieves better results than state-of-the-art methods.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

True or False: Does the Deep Learning Model Learn to Detect Rumors?

It is difficult for humans to distinguish the true and false of rumors, but current deep learning models can surpass humans and achieve excellent accuracy on many rumor datasets. In this paper, we investigate whether deep learning models that seem to perform well actually learn to detect rumors. We evaluate models on their generalization ability to out-of-domain examples by fine-tuning BERT-based models on five real-world datasets and evaluating against all test sets. The experimental results indicate that the generalization ability of the models on other unseen datasets are unsatisfactory, even common-sense rumors cannot be detected. Moreover, we found through experiments that models take shortcuts and learn absurd knowledge when the rumor datasets have serious data pitfalls. This means that simple modifications to the rumor text based on specific rules will lead to inconsistent model predictions. To more realistically evaluate rumor detection models, we proposed a new evaluation method called paired test (PairT), which requires models to correctly predict a pair of test samples at the same time. Furthermore, we make recommendations on how to better create rumor dataset and evaluate rumor detection model at the end of this paper.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access