Source author record

Shengye Qiao

Shengye Qiao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Rethinking Lightweight Salient Object Detection via Network Depth-Width Tradeoff

Existing salient object detection methods often adopt deeper and wider networks for better performance, resulting in heavy computational burden and slow inference speed. This inspires us to rethink saliency detection to achieve a favorable balance between efficiency and accuracy. To this end, we design a lightweight framework while maintaining satisfying competitive accuracy. Specifically, we propose a novel trilateral decoder framework by decoupling the U-shape structure into three complementary branches, which are devised to confront the dilution of semantic context, loss of spatial structure and absence of boundary detail, respectively. Along with the fusion of three branches, the coarse segmentation results are gradually refined in structure details and boundary quality. Without adding additional learnable parameters, we further propose Scale-Adaptive Pooling Module to obtain multi-scale receptive filed. In particular, on the premise of inheriting this framework, we rethink the relationship among accuracy, parameters and speed via network depth-width tradeoff. With these insightful considerations, we comprehensively design shallower and narrower models to explore the maximum potential of lightweight SOD. Our models are purposed for different application environments: 1) a tiny version CTD-S (1.7M, 125FPS) for resource constrained devices, 2) a fast version CTD-M (12.6M, 158FPS) for speed-demanding scenarios, 3) a standard version CTD-L (26.5M, 84FPS) for high-performance platforms. Extensive experiments validate the superiority of our method, which achieves better efficiency-accuracy balance across five benchmarks.