BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sergiu Ivanov

Sergiu Ivanov contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Formal Languages and Automata TheoryComputational ComplexityDiscrete MathematicsComputation and Languageeess.SYQuantitative MethodsSymbolic ComputationSystems and Control

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

P versus B: P Systems as a Formal Framework for Controllability of Boolean Networks

Membrane computing and P systems are a paradigm of massively parallel natural computing introduced by Gheorghe Păun in 1999, inspired by the structure of the living cell and by its biochemical reactions. In spite of this explicit biological motivation, P systems have not been extensively used in modelling real-world systems. To confirm this intuition, we establish a state of the art investigation comparing the use of P systems to that of Boolean networks in this line of research. We then propose to use P systems as a tool for setting up formal frameworks to reason about other formalisms, and we introduce Boolean P systems, specifically tailored for capturing sequential controllability of Boolean networks. We show how to tackle some technical challenges and prove that sequential controllability properly embeds in the framework of Boolean P systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Bisimilar Conversion of Multi-valued Networks to Boolean Networks

Discrete modelling frameworks of Biological networks can be divided in two distinct categories: Boolean and Multi-valued. Although Multi-valued networks are more expressive for qualifying the regulatory behaviours modelled by more than two values, the ability to automatically convert them to Boolean network with an equivalent behaviour breaks down the fundamental borders between the two approaches. Theoretically investigating the conversion process provides relevant insights into bridging the gap between them. Basically, the conversion aims at finding a Boolean network bisimulating a Multi-valued one. In this article, we investigate the bisimilar conversion where the Boolean integer coding is a parameter that can be freely modified. Based on this analysis, we define a computational method automatically inferring a bisimilar Boolean network from a given Multi-valued one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Controllability of reaction systems

Controlling a dynamical system is the ability of changing its configuration arbitrarily through a suitable choice of inputs. It is a very well studied concept in control theory, with wide ranging applications in medicine, biology, social sciences, engineering. We introduce in this article the concept of controllability of reaction systems as the ability of transitioning between any two states through a suitable choice of context sequences. We show that the problem is PSPACE-hard. We also introduce a model of oncogenic signalling based on reaction systems and use it to illustrate the intricacies of the controllability of reaction systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

One-dimensional Array Grammars and P Systems with Array Insertion and Deletion Rules

We consider the (one-dimensional) array counterpart of contextual as well as insertion and deletion string grammars and consider the operations of array insertion and deletion in array grammars. First we show that the emptiness problem for P systems with (one-dimensional) insertion rules is undecidable. Then we show computational completeness of P systems using (one-dimensional) array insertion and deletion rules even of norm one only. The main result of the paper exhibits computational completeness of one-dimensional array grammars using array insertion and deletion rules of norm at most two.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Small Universal Petri Nets with Inhibitor Arcs

We investigate the problem of construction of small-size universal Petri nets with inhibitor arcs. We consider four descriptional complexity parameters: the number of places, transitions, inhibitor arcs, and the maximal degree of a transition, each of which we try to minimize. We give six constructions having the following values of parameters (listed in the above order): $(30,34,13,3)$, $(14, 31, 51, 8)$, $(11, 31, 79, 11)$, $(21,25,13,5)$, $(67, 64, 8, 3)$, $(58, 55, 8, 5)$ that improve the few known results on this topic. Our investigation also highlights several interesting trade-offs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Random Context and Semi-Conditional Insertion-Deletion Systems

In this article we introduce the operations of insertion and deletion working in a random-context and semi-conditional manner. We show that the conditional use of rules strictly increase the computational power. In the case of semi-conditional insertion-deletion systems context-free insertion and deletion rules of one symbol are sufficient to get the computational completeness. In the random context case our results expose an asymmetry between the computational power of insertion and deletion rules: systems of size $(2,0,0; 1,1,0)$ are computationally complete, while systems of size $(1,1,0;2,0,0)$ (and more generally of size $(1,1,0;p,1,1)$) are not. This is particularly interesting because other control mechanisms like graph-control or matrix control used together with insertion-deletion systems do not present such asymmetry.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access