BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sergei Zavgorodni

Sergei Zavgorodni contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
6works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Generalized coordinate transformations for Monte Carlo (DOSXYZnrc and VMC++) verifications of DICOM compatible radiotherapy treatment plans

The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has previously defined standard rotation operators for positive gantry, collimator and couch rotations for the radiotherapy DICOM coordinate system that is commonly used by treatment planning systems. Coordinate transformations to the coordinate systems of commonly used Monte Carlo (MC) codes (BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc and VMC++) have been derived and published in the literature. However, these coordinate transformations disregard patient orientation during the computed tomography (CT) scan, and assume the most commonly used 'head first, supine' orientation. While less common, other patient orientations are used in clinics - Monte Carlo verification of such treatments can be problematic due to the lack of appropriate coordinate transformations. In this work, a solution has been obtained by correcting the CT-derived phantom orientation and deriving generalized coordinate transformations for field angles in the DOSXYZnrc and VMC++ codes. The rotation operator that includes any possible patient treatment orientation was determined using the DICOM Image Orientation tag (0020,0037). The derived transformations of the patient image and beam direction angles were verified by comparison of MC dose distributions with the Eclipse treatment planning system, calculated for each of the eight possible patient orientations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Monte Carlo simulation of MLC-shaped TrueBeam electron fields benchmarked against measurement

Modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) and combined, modulated photon/electron radiotherapy (MPERT) have received increased research attention, having shown capacity for reduced low dose exposure to healthy tissue and comparable, if not improved, target coverage for a number of treatment sites. Accurate dose calculation tools are necessary for clinical treatment planning, and Monte Carlo (MC) is the gold standard for electron field simulation. With many clinics replacing older accelerators, MC source models of the new machines are needed for continued development, however, Varian has kept internal schematics of the TrueBeam confidential and electron phase-space sources have not been made available. TrueBeam electron fields are not substantially different from those generated by the Clinac 21EX, so we have modified the internal schematics of the Clinac 21EX to simulate TrueBeam electrons. BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc were used to simulate 5x5 and 20x20 cm$^2$ electron fields with MLC-shaped apertures. Secondary collimating jaws were set 0.5 cm beyond the MLC periphery and to 40x40 cm$^2$. Complete accelerator models agreed with diode measurement within 2%/2 mm at 12 and 20 MeV, and within 3%/3 mm at 6 MeV. Comparisons of measured depth and profile data showed dose-dependencies on jaw position; simulated energy fluences scored just above the phantom showed that, for small apertures, dose dependencies on jaw position are dominated by changes in the in-field energy fluence (not scattered by jaws or MLC) at 6 MeV, while at 20 MeV dose dependencies are dominated by the scattered component. Our models reproduce these jaw position dependencies, which is an asset as there is no consensus on the optimal position for jaws in modulated electron field delivery. Good agreement between simulation and measurement and flexibility in jaw position make our models appropriate for use in MERT and MPERT planning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

GPU-based Monte Carlo radiotherapy dose calculation using phase-space sources

A novel phase-space source implementation has been designed for GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation engines. Due to the parallelized nature of GPU hardware, it is essential to simultaneously transport particles of the same type and similar energies but separated spatially to yield a high efficiency. We present three methods for phase-space implementation that have been integrated into the most recent version of the GPU-based Monte Carlo radiotherapy dose calculation package gDPM v3.0. The first method is to sequentially read particles from a patient-dependent phase-space and sort them on-the-fly based on particle type and energy. The second method supplements this with a simple secondary collimator model and fluence map implementation so that patient-independent phase-space sources can be used. Finally, as the third method (called the phase-space-let, or PSL, method) we introduce a novel strategy to pre-process patient-independent phase-spaces and bin particles by type, energy and position. Position bins located outside a rectangular region of interest enclosing the treatment field are ignored, substantially decreasing simulation time. The three methods were validated in absolute dose against BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc and compared using gamma-index tests (2%/2mm above the 10% isodose). It was found that the PSL method has the optimal balance between accuracy and efficiency and thus is used as the default method in gDPM v3.0. Using the PSL method, open fields of 4x4, 10x10 and 30x30 cm2 in water resulted in gamma passing rates of 99.96%, 99.92% and 98.66%, respectively. Relative output factors agreed within 1%. An IMRT patient plan using the PSL method resulted in a passing rate of 97%, and was calculated in 50 seconds using a single GPU compared to 8.4 hours (per CPU) for BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Monitor backscatter factors for the Varian 21EX and TrueBeam linear accelerators: measurements and Monte Carlo modeling

Purpose/Objective: Backscattered radiation (BSR) into linac monitor chamber has to be accounted for in radiotherapy dose calculations. In Monte Carlo (MC) calculations, the BSR can be modeled explicitly, but only when treatment head geometry is available. In this study, monitor backscatter factors (MBSFs), defined as the ratio of the charge collected in the monitor chamber for a reference field to that of a given field, have been evaluated experimentally and incorporated into MC modelling of linacs with either known or unknown treatment head geometry. Materials and methods: A telescopic technique similar to that by Kubo (1989) was used. However, instead of lead slits, a 1.8 mm diameter collimator and a small (2 mm diameter) detector positioned at extended SDD were used. This setup provided a field of view to the source of less than 3.1 mm and allowed for MBSF measurements of open fields from 1 x 1 to 40 x 40 cm2. MBSFs were also explicitly modeled in MC calculations using BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc codes for 6MV and 18MV beams of a Varian 21EX linac. A method for deriving the Dchforward values that are used in MC absolute dose calculations was demonstrated. These values were derived from measured MBSFs for two 21EX and four TrueBeam energies. Results: MBSFs were measured for 6MV and 18MV beams from Varian 21EX, and for 6MV, 10MV-FFF, 10MV, and 15MV beams from Varian TrueBeam linacs. For the open field sizes modeled in this study for the 21EX, the measured MBSFs agreed with MC calculated values within combined statistical (0.4%) and experimental (0.2%) uncertainties. Variation of MBSFs across field sizes was about a factor of two smaller for the TrueBeam compared to 21EX Varian linacs. Conclusions: Measured MBSFs and the derived Dchforward factors allow for the incorporation of the BSR effect into accurate radiotherapy dose calculations without explicit backscatter modelling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Monte Carlo investigation into feasibility and dosimetry of flat Flattening Filter Free beams

Flattening filter free (FFF) beams due to their non-uniformity, are sub-optimal for larger field sizes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incident electron beam distributions that would produce flat FFF beams without the use of flattening filter. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc codes have been performed to evaluate the feasibility of this approach. The dose distributions in water for open 6MV beams were simulated using Varian 21EX linac head model, which will be called flattening filter (FF) model. Flattening filter has then been removed from FF model, and MC simulations were performed using (1) 6 MeV electrons incident on the target, (2) 6 MeV electron beam with electron angular distributions optimized to provide as flat dose profiles as possible. Configuration (1) represents FFF beam while configuration (2) allowed producing a flat FFF (F4) beam. Optimizations have also been performed to produce flattest profiles for a set of dose rates (DRs) in the range from 1.25 to 2.4 of the DR of FF beam. Profiles and percentage depth doses PDDs from 6MV F4 beams have been calculated and compared to those from FF beam. Calculated profiles demonstrated improved flatness of the FFF beams. In fact, up to field sizes within the circle of 35 cm diameter the flatness of F4 beam at dmax was better or comparable to that of FF beam. At 20 cm off-axis the dose increased from 52% for FFF to 92% for F4 beam. Also, profiles of F4 beams did not change considerably with depth, and for large fields out-of-field dose was reduced by about a factor of two compared to FF beam. PDDs from F4 beams were similar to those of FFF beam. The DR for the largest modeled (44 cm diameter) F4 beam was higher than the DR from FF beam by a factor of 1.25. It was shown that the DR can be increased while maintaining beam flatness, but at the cost of reduced field size.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Pre-treatment radiotherapy dose verification using Monte Carlo doselet modulation in a spherical phantom

Due to the increasing complexity of radiotherapy delivery, accurate dose verification has become an essential part of the clinical treatment process. The purpose of this work was to develop an electronic portal image (EPI) based pre-treatment verification technique capable of quickly reconstructing 3D dose distributions from both coplanar and non-coplanar treatments. The dose reconstruction is performed in a spherical water phantom by modulating, based on EPID measurements, pre-calculated Monte Carlo (MC) doselets defined on a spherical coordinate system. This is called the spherical doselet modulation (SDM) method. This technique essentially eliminates the statistical uncertainty of the MC dose calculations by exploiting both azimuthal symmetry in a patient-independent phase-space and symmetry of a virtual spherical water phantom. The symmetry also allows the number of doselets necessary for dose reconstruction to be reduced by a factor of about 250. In this work, 51 doselets were used. The SDM method mitigates the most computationally intensive part of this type of dose reconstruction - reading, weighting and summing dose matrices. The accuracy of the system was tested against MC calculations as well as our previously reported phase-space modulation (PSM) method using a series of open field and IMRT cases. The mean chi- and gamma-test 3% / 3 mm success rates of the SDM method were 98.6% and 99.5%, respectively, when compared to full MC simulation. The total calculation time was 96 seconds per treatment field on a single processor core.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access